tune
/tune
Dobiera rozmiar fragmentów i konfigurację wyszukiwania pod własny korpus, mierząc nDCG, MRR i Hit@5 na zestawie zapytań.
- Autor
- nicholasglazer ↗
- Repozytorium
- gnosis-mcp ↗
- Licencja
- MIT
- Ostatnia zmiana repozytorium
- 15.10.2026
Ocena i bezpieczeństwo
- Pliki w paczce
- 1
- Skrypty
- 0
- Komentarze HTML
- 0
- Adresy URL w SKILL.md
- 2
Brak sygnałów. Repozytorium zmienione 15.10.2026, bez odwołań do wycofanych modeli i API.
MIT, otwarta: można używać i zmieniać, z zachowaniem informacji o autorze.
Co robi i kiedy
Dobiera rozmiar fragmentów i konfigurację wyszukiwania pod własny korpus, mierząc nDCG, MRR i Hit@5 na zestawie zapytań.
Oryginalny opis (EN)
Find the chunk-size and retrieval config that maximizes quality on YOUR corpus. Sweeps chunk sizes, runs a golden-query set, reports nDCG / MRR / Hit@5. Use after first ingest or whenever your corpus changes shape significantly.
Jak działa
- Usage
- Mode: $ARGUMENTS
- Prerequisites
- Quick sweep (default)
- Full sweep (full)
- Programmatic golden-set from existing access logs
- Automate the winner
- When to re-tune
- See also
Podgląd SKILL.md
---
name: tune
description: Find the chunk-size and retrieval config that maximizes quality on YOUR corpus. Sweeps chunk sizes, runs a golden-query set, reports nDCG / MRR / Hit@5. Use after first ingest or whenever your corpus changes shape significantly.
disable-model-invocation: true
---
# Tune
Every RAG system has a distribution where it breaks. The only way to
know whether gnosis-mcp's defaults are right for *your* corpus is to
measure them against *your* queries. This skill runs that measurement.
## Usage
```
/gnosis:tune # Quick sweep (5 chunk sizes, keyword mode)
/gnosis:tune full # Extended sweep (keyword + hybrid + rerank on/off)
/gnosis:tune --golden ./q.jsonl # Use a specific golden-query file
```
## Mode: $ARGUMENTS
---
## Prerequisites
You need:
1. A corpus — anywhere on disk. Will be passed to `gnosis-mcp ingest`.
2. A golden-query file — one JSON object per line:
```json
{"query": "how does our auth work", "expected_paths": ["docs/auth", "architecture/auth"]}
{"query": "stripe webhook failure runbook", "expected_paths": ["runbooks/stripe"]}
```
`expected_paths` uses substring match against the returned `file_path`,
case-insensitive. Generous enough that you don't need exact path
memorization.
20 hand-written queries is enough to get signal. 50 is plenty.
---
## Quick sweep (default)
Runs `gnosis-mcp ingest` 5 times with different chunk sizes, scoring
each with your golden set. Keyword mode only (fast, no embedding cost).
```bash
# Default path if none given: ./docs + ./golden.jsonl
CORPUS=${CORPUS:-./docs}
GOLDEN=${GOLDEN:-./golden.jsonl}
for size in 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000; do
uv run --with 'gnosis-mcp[embeddings] @ gnosis-mcp' \
python tests/bench/bench_real_corpus.py \
--corpus "$CORPUS" --golden "$GOLDEN" \
--modes keyword --chunk-size $size \
--out bench-results/tune-chunk${size}.json
done
```
(If gnosis-mcp was installed via pip rather than from source, invoke
`bench_real_corpus.py` from the repo you cloned, and drop the
`uv run --with '... @ .'` prefix.)
Expected runtime: 5–10 minutes per size on a typical laptop (ingest is
the dominant cost; scoring itself is sub-second).
Output table:
```
chunk chars │ nDCG@10 │ MRR │ Hit@5 │ p95 │ ingest
────────────┼─────────┼────────┼────────┼──────────┼────────
1000 │ 0.8557 │ 0.8067 │ 0.92 │ 30 ms │ 592 s
1500 │ 0.8529 │ 0.7967 │ 0.92 │ 7 ms │ 234 s
2000 │ 0.8702 │ 0.7933 │ 0.92 │ 7 ms │ 210 s ← peak
2500 │ 0.8602 │ 0.7880 │ 0.92 │ 7 ms │ 195 s
3000 │ 0.8459 │ 0.7880 │ 0.92 │ 7 ms │ 182 s
```
Pick the chunk size with the best nDCG@10 that doesn't blow your
ingest-time budget. Persist it:
```bash
# In your shell profile / .env
export GNOSIS_MCP_CHUNK_SIZE=2000
```
If multiple sizes tie at the top (plateau), pick the **larger** one —
same quality, fewer chunks, faster ingest.
---
## Full sweep (`full`)
Adds hybrid mode and optional reranker A/B — ~30-40 minutes depending
on corpus size and whether `[reranking]` is installed.
```bash
for size in 1500 2000 3000; do
for mode in keyword hybrid hybrid+rerank; do
uv run --with 'gnosis-mcp[embeddings,reranking] @ gnosis-mcp' \
python tests/bench/bench_real_corpus.py \
--corpus "$CORPUS" --golden "$GOLDEN" \
--modes "$mode" --chunk-size $size \
--out "bench-results/tune-${mode//+/_}-${size}.json"
done
done
```
### What to read from the output
1. **nDCG delta between keyword and hybrid**: if < 0.02, your corpus is
vocabulary-matched (queries share exact terms with docs). Dense
retrieval adds latency without lift — leave hybrid off.
2. **nDCG delta when reranker is added**: on dev docs specifically, we
measure -27 nDCG (!). If you see a similar drop, your corpus has
the same distribution problem — disable
`GNOSIS_MCP_RERANK_ENABLED`. If it's +3-10 on your corpus, keep it
on.
3. **Chunk-size peak location**: tells you the typical topic-coherent
block length in your corpus. API-reference-heavy corpora peak
lower (1000-1500 chars). Long-form prose peaks higher (2500-3000).
---
## Programmatic golden-set from existing access logs
If you've been using gnosis-mcp for a while, real queries are already
logged. Generate a seed golden file from them:
```bash
sqlite3 ~/.local/share/gnosis-mcp/docs.db \
"SELECT DISTINCT query FROM search_access_log
WHERE timestamp > date('now', '-30 days')
ORDER BY count(*) DESC LIMIT 30;" \
| awk '{print "{\"query\":\""$0"\", \"expected_paths\": []}"}' > golden-seed.jsonl
```
Then fill in `expected_paths` by hand — 5 minutes of work, gives you a
golden set grounded in how you actually use the system.
---
## Automate the winner
After picking a chunk size and reranker/hybrid choice, persist it so
every `gnosis-mcp ingest` (manual or via `--watch`) uses the tuned
settings:
```bash
# Persistent across processes
export GNOSIS_MCP_CHUNK_SIZE=2000
export GNOSIS_MCP_RERANK_ENABLED=false # if tune showed it hurts
# Re-ingest with the new config
gnosis-mcp ingest ./docs --embed --wipe
```
---
## When to re-tune
- Corpus grows 2× or more
- You add a fundamentally different content type (e.g., API references
added to a prose-only corpus, or vice versa)
- You switch embedder (`GNOSIS_MCP_EMBED_MODEL`) — the semantic side
of hybrid now behaves differently
- After a new release of gnosis-mcp that touched chunking or fusion
Otherwise: tune once per year. It's not free but it's not frequent.
---
## See also
- [bench-experiments-2026-04-18](https://gnosismcp.com/doc/docs/bench-experiments-2026-04-18)
— our own tune results with the methodology that informed these
defaults
- [how-we-measure-search](https://gnosismcp.com/doc/docs/how-we-measure-search)
— what these metrics mean, in plain English
- `/gnosis:ingest` — re-ingest after you've picked the winner
Wersje
| Repozytorium | Wynik | Licencja |
|---|---|---|
| Ta strona · nicholasglazer/gnosis-mcp | 100 | MIT |
| ARCASSystems/FounderOS | 100 | MIT |
| artk0de/tearags-mcp | 100 | MIT |
| Necmttn/ax | 100 | AGPL-3.0 |
| lexfrei/ccc | 100 | BSD-3-Clause |
| duthaho/skillhub | 100 | MIT |
| notmehul/marshmallow | 100 | MIT |
| lsnackerman/raw-clauding | 90 | CC-BY-SA-4.0 |
Migawka bazy z 13.11.2026 · wersja paczki ffa8b06442de (skrót SHA-256 całej paczki)
Pobrania w ostatnich 30 dniach: 0 · ranking
Zgłoś problem z tym skillem: szkodliwa treść, błędny opis albo prośba autora o usunięcie.
Podobne skille
- 100retrieval-quality-metrics
Liczy i interpretuje metryki wyszukiwania, takie jak recall, precision, MRR i nDCG, z podziałem na segmenty i rzetelnym porównaniem wariantów. - 100embeddings-search
Pomaga wybrać model embeddingów, rozmiar chunków i formę zapytania, poprawić trafność wyszukiwania, dodać hybrydę BM25 z wektorami lub reranker i mierzyć recall@k, nDCG oraz MRR. - 100rag-evaluation
Ocenia systemy RAG z użyciem RAGAS, DeepEval, TruLens, LLM-as-judge, złotych zbiorów danych, testów A/B oraz metryk Hit@K, MRR i NDCG. - 100judgment-list-author
Tworzy listy ocen trafności dla wyszukiwarki: zestawy zapytań, skale ocen, wytyczne dla oceniających, zgodność między oceniającymi i odświeżanie, jako ground truth dla NDCG, MRR i Recall@k. - 100evaluate-semantic-search-engine
Ocenia semantyczną wyszukiwarkę: NDCG@10, MRR, odsetek zapytań bez wyników, opóźnienie zapytań, zysk personalizacji i jakość osadzeń. - 90token-chunk
Projektuje strategie dzielenia dokumentów na fragmenty: podział semantyczny, strojenie nakładania i rozmiar fragmentów dostosowany do wyszukiwania.