graphify-usage
/graphify-usage
Wyjaśnia, jak odpytywać graf wiedzy graphify o strukturę kodu, kiedy wybrać narzędzia grafowe zamiast grep i jak czytać wyniki zapytań.
- Autor
- josix ↗
- Repozytorium
- agent-flow ↗
- Licencja
- MIT
- Ostatnia zmiana repozytorium
- 27.10.2026
Ocena i bezpieczeństwo
- Pliki w paczce
- 4
- Skrypty
- 0
- Komentarze HTML
- 0
- Adresy URL w SKILL.md
- 0
Brak sygnałów. Repozytorium zmienione 27.10.2026, bez odwołań do wycofanych modeli i API.
MIT, otwarta: można używać i zmieniać, z zachowaniem informacji o autorze.
Co robi i kiedy
Wyjaśnia, jak odpytywać graf wiedzy graphify o strukturę kodu, kiedy wybrać narzędzia grafowe zamiast grep i jak czytać wyniki zapytań.
Oryginalny opis (EN)
This skill should be used when querying the graphify knowledge graph for structural codebase information, choosing between graph tools and grep, or interpreting graph query results.
Jak działa
- Overview
- When to Query the Graph vs. Grep
- Tool Decision Table
- Token Hygiene
- Result Interpretation
- What NOT to Do
- Cross-References
Podgląd SKILL.md
--- name: graphify-usage user-invocable: false description: This skill should be used when querying the graphify knowledge graph for structural codebase information, choosing between graph tools and grep, or interpreting graph query results. --- # Graphify Usage Query the knowledge graph effectively, interpret results accurately, and stay within token budgets. ## Overview The graphify MCP server exposes the codebase as a pre-built knowledge graph stored in `graphify-out/graph.json`. The graph encodes structural relationships between concepts, modules, and files extracted by the graphify pipeline. This skill governs when, how, and with what discipline agents should query it. **Owner**: Riko (Explorer Agent) — Riko is the primary graph query agent and owns interpretation of results. **Consumers**: Senku (Planner Agent), Lawliet (Reviewer Agent) — both may consult the graph during planning and review, but Riko is the preferred query agent for deep exploration. **Out of scope**: Loid (Executor) and Alphonse (Verifier) do NOT have graph access by design. Loid performs file writes and needs test output, not structural queries; Alphonse runs verification commands that cannot rely on graph freshness. This enforces the one-writer invariant: only agents that need structural context hold graph tool permissions. All 7 tools are accessed via the MCP prefix `mcp__plugin_agent-flow_graphify__*`. See [references/tool-reference.md](references/tool-reference.md) for full signatures. --- ## When to Query the Graph vs. Grep Use the graph when you need structural relationships. Use grep when you need literal text matches. | Trigger condition | Preferred approach | |---|---| | "What modules import X?" / dependency mapping | Graph: `get_neighbors` with `relation_filter` | | "What is the main entry point?" / orientation | Graph: `graph_stats` then `god_nodes` | | "How does component A connect to component B?" | Graph: `shortest_path` | | "Which community does file F belong to?" | Graph: `get_community` on node label | | "Find the string literal `TODO: fix`" | Grep | | "Find all files that define function `parse_args`" | Grep (pattern match) | | "What does a specific config key say?" | Read the file directly | | File is freshly edited (within this session) | Grep/Read — graph may be stale | | Graph does not exist at `graphify-out/graph.json` | Grep/Read only | **Rule of thumb**: If the answer requires traversal (who calls what, what clusters together, how far apart are two concepts), use the graph. If the answer is a literal substring or you need up-to-the-edit accuracy, use Grep or Read. --- ## Tool Decision Table Choose the right tool for the question type. See [references/query-patterns.md](references/query-patterns.md) for detailed decision sequences. | Question type | Primary tool | Follow-up | |---|---|---| | How large is this codebase? | `graph_stats` | `god_nodes` for core abstractions | | What are the central concepts? | `god_nodes` | `get_community` to explore clusters | | Which modules are in the same cluster? | `get_community` | `get_node` on members | | What does this node connect to? | `get_neighbors` | `get_node` on callers/callees | | Blast radius of changing X | `get_neighbors` then `shortest_path` | Manual review of connected files | | Full structural/semantic question | `query_graph` (BFS for broad, DFS for path) | `get_node` on returned labels | | Specific node details | `get_node` | — | | Path between two concepts | `shortest_path` | `get_node` on intermediate nodes | --- ## Token Hygiene Hard rules for staying within context budget: 1. **Always set `top_k` / `top_n`** when available. Default `god_nodes` returns 10 nodes — only request more if explicitly needed. 2. **Set `token_budget`** on `query_graph` calls. The default is 2000 tokens; lower it (e.g., 500) for quick orientation queries. 3. **Set `depth` conservatively**. Default depth is 3; start at 1-2 for narrow questions, increase only if the result is insufficient. 4. **Do NOT paste raw subgraph JSON downstream** into task prompts or summaries. Extract only node IDs, labels, and `source_location` fields. 5. **Summarize before handing off**. Convert graph results to bullet lists of `label → source_location` pairs. Downstream agents (Senku, Lawliet) need names and file paths, not raw graph output. 6. **Chain calls, don't parallelize blindly**. Run `graph_stats` first, then decide if `god_nodes` is needed. Avoid firing all 7 tools simultaneously. --- ## Result Interpretation How to read and trust what the graph returns: ### Cite `source_location` fields Every node in the graph carries a `source_location` field (file path, sometimes line range). When reporting a finding, always cite this field: ``` Node: AgentOrchestrator source_location: commands/orchestrate.md:1 ``` Never report a concept without its `source_location` — downstream agents cannot verify unsourced claims. ### Surface confidence tags The graph annotates edges with confidence labels: | Tag | Meaning | Trust level | |---|---|---| | EXTRACTED | Directly observed in source text | High — treat as fact | | INFERRED | Model-reasoned relationship | Medium — verify if load-bearing | | AMBIGUOUS | Multiple interpretations possible | Low — always verify with Read/Grep | When an edge is INFERRED or AMBIGUOUS, note this explicitly in your summary. Do not present inferred relationships as certainties. ### Trust-but-verify for freshly edited files The graph is built once (at `/graphify` time) and is not updated during a session. If Loid has modified a file in the current session, graph data for that node is stale. For any file touched in this session: - Use the graph for structural orientation only - Use Read or Grep for current content --- ## What NOT to Do - **Do not query the graph on freshly edited files** expecting current content — it will be stale. - **Do not set `depth` > 4** without a specific reason — the output will overflow context. - **Do not pass raw graph JSON blobs** in task descriptions or summaries to other agents. - **Do not fire `query_graph` for questions answerable by `get_node` or `get_neighbors`** — cheaper specific tools first. - **Do not report INFERRED edges as facts** — always surface the confidence tag. - **Do not skip `source_location` citations** — every claimed relationship needs a file anchor. - **Do not use graph results as a substitute for reading changed files** — the graph captures structure, not current content. --- ## Cross-References - [docs/guides/using-graphify.md](../../docs/guides/using-graphify.md) — installation, build steps, and how to run the graphify pipeline - [references/tool-reference.md](references/tool-reference.md) — full MCP tool signatures, parameters, cost profiles - [references/query-patterns.md](references/query-patterns.md) — decision table mapping question types to tool sequences - [examples/worked-queries.md](examples/worked-queries.md) — end-to-end query scenarios with expected result shapes
Pliki w paczce (4)
- SKILL.md 7 KB
- examples/worked-queries.md 6 KB
- references/query-patterns.md 4 KB
- references/tool-reference.md 5 KB
Wersje
W bazie nie ma innych skilli o nazwie graphify-usage.
Migawka bazy z 13.11.2026 · wersja paczki 1cacd7ee5380 (skrót SHA-256 całej paczki)
Pobrania w ostatnich 30 dniach: 0 · ranking
Zgłoś problem z tym skillem: szkodliwa treść, błędny opis albo prośba autora o usunięcie.
Podobne skille
- 90graphify
Odpowiada na pytania o strukturę kodu i projektu, budując trwały graf wiedzy z kodu, dokumentów i obrazów. - 100graphify
Buduje graf wiedzy z kodu źródłowego przez CLI graphify, by odpowiedzieć, jak części projektu łączą się i zależą od siebie. - 100graphify
Mapuje folder lub bazę kodu na graf wiedzy za pomocą graphify CLI bez kosztów LLM i odpowiada na pytania o architekturę i zależności. - 90graphify
Odpowiada na pytania o bazę kodu i projekt, najpierw kierując je do grafu wiedzy, i buduje graf z kodu, dokumentów i nagrań. - 95graphify
Odpowiada na pytania o bazę kodu, architekturę i zależności, budując i przeszukując graf wiedzy z kodu, dokumentów, artykułów i obrazów. - 95graphify
Odpowiada na pytania o bazę kodu, architekturę i zależności, budując i przeszukując graf wiedzy z kodu, dokumentów, artykułów i obrazów.