Skip to content
Skills Library
Programming · Writing

write-discoverable-code

/write-discoverable-code

Rules for writing code that coding agents (and humans) can find and understand through plain-text search. Apply whenever writing or renaming code: functions, types, constants, files, error messages, doc comments. Grounded in measurement: agents navigate by plain-text search, not by AST or language server, so every identifier is a search query and every search miss costs wasted reads.

Repository
skills ↗
Licence
MIT
Last repository change
20.07.2026

Assessment and security

100/ 100Class: good
Format25 / 25
Frontmatter with name and description, valid name, description up to 1,024 characters, name matching the folder.
Discoverability25 / 25
Description explains when to use the skill, has a reasonable length and uses third person.
Content35 / 35
At least 150 words and at most 500 lines, headings, step lists, examples or code.
Hygiene15 / 15
No placeholders such as TODO, no Windows paths, with a licence.
Riskno signals detected in the scan
Files in this package
1
Scripts
0
HTML comments
0
URLs in SKILL.md
0
Deprecation

No signals detected. Repository changed on 20.07.2026, without references to retired models or APIs.

Licence

MIT, open: use and modify while retaining author attribution.

What it does and when to use it

Rules for writing code that coding agents (and humans) can find and understand through plain-text search. Apply whenever writing or renaming code: functions, types, constants, files, error messages, doc comments. Grounded in measurement: agents navigate by plain-text search, not by AST or language server, so every identifier is a search query and every search miss costs wasted reads.

Original author description

Rules for writing code that coding agents (and humans) can find and understand through plain-text search. Apply whenever writing or renaming code: functions, types, constants, files, error messages, doc comments. Grounded in measurement: agents navigate by plain-text search, not by AST or language server, so every identifier is a search query and every search miss costs wasted reads.

How it works

  1. 1. Names are search queries
  2. 2. Types are the documentation agents can't skip
  3. 3. Say it where the search lands
  4. Quick checklist before committing
Original SKILL.md headings · 96 lines, 975 words
SKILL.md preview
---
name: write-discoverable-code
description: |
  Rules for writing code that coding agents (and humans) can find and understand through
  plain-text search. Apply whenever writing or renaming code: functions, types, constants,
  files, error messages, doc comments.

  Grounded in measurement: agents navigate by plain-text search, not by AST or
  language server, so every identifier is a search query and every search miss
  costs wasted reads.
license: MIT
---

# Write discoverable code

Coding agents discover code by searching for strings and reading small windows around the
hits. They have no hover text, no jump-to-definition, and no memory between sessions. These
rules make code resolvable in one search instead of five.

## 1. Names are search queries

- **Exported symbols get 2–4 word names, at least one of them a domain word.**
  `diffUserObjects`, not `diff`. `queueEventForDispatch`, not `queue`.
  Measured on a ~700k-line monorepo: 1-word exported names are globally unique 61% of
  the time; 3-word names 96%; 4+ words 98%. Three words is the knee of the curve.
  Use the shortest name that greps uniquely; put the rest in the doc comment.
- **Give generic verbs their object.** `sanitizeEmailHtml`, not `sanitize`;
  `validateSmtpConfig`, not `validateConfig`. Qualify only as far as uniqueness
  requires, then stop.
- **One definition site per symbol.** Never copy a function between files; move it and
  delete the original in the same change. Shared helpers get one concept-named home
  and are imported everywhere else.
- **Do not rely on the module path to disambiguate a generic name.** The import that
  disambiguates `users/diff.ts` from `orders/diff.ts` sits at the top of the file; the
  search hit is at line 300. Put the context in the symbol (`formatDurationMs`), not the
  folder. Exception: rigid, absolute conventions where the path carries the meaning
  (e.g. every contract file exporting `Input`/`Output`).
- **One concept, one spelling.** Pick `organizationId` or `orgId` and use it everywhere;
  every synonym splits every future search in half. Reuse existing vocabulary in the
  codebase you are editing rather than introducing near-synonyms.
- **When behavior or audience changes, rename in the same commit.** A stale name is
  misinformation with a 100% open rate — that includes visibility markers: a `_private`
  helper that other modules now import needs a public name.
- **Filenames are names too — never use bare-role filenames.** `config.ts`, `types.ts`,
  `utils.ts`, `helpers.ts`, `handlers.ts` say nothing in a search result and collide with
  every other module's config/types/utils in the repo. Prefix the domain:
  `billing-plan-config.ts`, not `config.ts`. (`index.ts` is acceptable only as a
  thin re-export entry point.)

## 2. Types are the documentation agents can't skip

- **Brand your primitive IDs.** `z.string().brand<'UserId'>()` (TS) or newtypes (Rust).
  A `transferOwnership(userId: string, orgId: string)` signature makes argument
  transposition invisible; branded types make it a compile error that names the concepts.
- **Use capability-token parameter types** for privileged operations (e.g. requiring an
  `OrgScopedDb` instead of a raw connection). A comment is a request; a required type is
  physics.
- **Model state with discriminated unions**, not clusters of nullable fields with implicit
  rules.
- **Name types like they'll be quoted back** — they will be, in compiler errors the agent
  uses to self-correct. `OrgScopedDb` explains itself; `Ctx2` does not. Avoid `any`: every
  `any` is a spot where the compiler goes silent and the agent is back to guessing.

## 3. Say it where the search lands

- **One-line doc comment on every export**, stating the sharpest constraint the code
  itself can't show (units, timezone, "source time, not insert time", ownership).
  The definition is where a name search lands; that line is your whole message.
- **Write the plain-words phrase in the doc comment.** Searches arrive as natural language
  ("rate limit", "retry delay"), and camelCase identifiers don't match phrase greps —
  `RateLimiter` is invisible to a search for "rate limit". The doc comment above each
  export should contain, in ordinary spaced-out words, the phrase someone would search
  for: a `SessionExpiryChecker` should say /\*_ Checks whether the user session has
  expired. _/ so that a grep for "session expired" or "session has expired" lands here.
- **A module should make sense with its imports unread.** Each imported name plus its
  doc line should say enough that the reader never has to open the source module. If
  they do, the import's name is failing, not the reader.
- **Keep strings whole.** Never build event names, flags, or error codes with template
  interpolation (`` `github.${entity}.${action}` `` makes `github.pr.merged` unsearchable).
  Write the full literal even when a loop feels DRYer.
- **Error messages start with a unique literal prefix**, so a message seen in a log greps
  straight back to the throw site. ``throw new Error(`Webhook signature mismatch for ${id}`)``,
  never ``throw new Error(`${prefix}: mismatch`)``.
- **One searchable concept per file, and keep orchestrators thin.** The code that answers
  "where is X done?" should live in a module named after X — the thing a reader would
  ask about, not the mechanism inside — not inline in a coordinator,
  pipeline, or service class. An orchestrator should read as a sequence of calls into
  well-named modules; if a reader lands in it from a search, every line should point them
  one hop from the real implementation. Burying the implementation of several concepts in
  one large file makes every search for any of them land on the same wall of code.
  Split until each question-sized concept has one named home, then stop: a helper
  meaningful only inside one concept belongs inline, and a file per tiny function
  fragments one answer across several reads. The test runs both ways: a module that
  answers many unrelated questions is holding more than one concept.
- **Colocate tests** (`foo.test.ts` next to `foo.ts`) so one search finds behavior and its
  specification together.
- **Mark dead ends.** `@deprecated` on the old path, with a pointer to the new one.

## Quick checklist before committing

1. Would one search for each new exported name be enough to find its implementation?
2. Would swapping two arguments of the new function fail the build?
3. Is the one thing a caller must know but the signature can't say (units, timezone,
   ownership, ordering) written right at the definition?
4. Do all log/error strings exist verbatim in the source?
5. Did anything change behavior without changing its name?
6. When code moved, is it gone from where it came from?

Versions

RepositoryScoreLicence
This page · modem-dev/skills100MIT
michalvavra/agents100MIT
luxass/agent-skills100MIT

Identical content appears in 1 other GitHub folders. We show one copy with the highest score.

Database snapshot: 13.11.2026 · package version b00726985982 (SHA-256 digest of the entire package)

Downloads in the last 30 days: 0 · ranking

Report a problem with this skill: harmful content, incorrect descriptions or an author’s removal request.

Similar skills

  • 100writing-maintainable-code
    Principles for code that is easy to understand, change and trust. Use when writing, refactoring or reviewing code in any language, when a change touches business logic, external APIs, validation or error handling, or when preparing a commit or pull request.
  • 100ast-grep
    Write, debug, and validate ast-grep structural code search rules. Use for syntax-aware code search, AST pattern matching, structural refactor discovery, or searches plain text tools like rg can miss — functions with particular descendants, calls inside specific contexts,…
  • 100plain-writing
    Writing rules for prose that ships with the code or that other agents read. Use when writing or editing code comments and doc blocks, commit messages, pull request titles and descriptions, review comments, issues, changesets, release notes, documentation, ADRs, interface text…
  • 100ast-grep
    Guide for writing ast-grep rules to perform structural code search and analysis. Use when users need to search codebases using Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) patterns, find specific code structures, or perform complex code queries that go beyond simple text search. This skill should…
  • 100ast-grep
    Guide for writing ast-grep rules to perform structural code search and analysis. Use when users need to search codebases using Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) patterns, find specific code structures, or perform complex code queries that go beyond simple text search. This skill should…
  • 100file-search
    This skill should be used when agents need to search codebases for text patterns or structural code patterns. Provides fast search using ripgrep for text and ast-grep for syntax-aware code search.

Feedback and reports

Your message goes to Bartosz Sokoliński. An email address is needed only for a reply. See the privacy policy.