ml
/ml
Machine learning and LLM engineering judgment, distilled from a stronger model - invoke when DECIDING whether/how to use ML or an LLM for a task (prompt vs RAG vs fine-tune vs classical); working with training/eval data or labels; building or reviewing evals for models and LLM features; designing RAG, structured output, or agent pipelines; or diagnosing why a model/LLM feature underperforms. Method-selection ladder, data and leakage discipline, eval-as-spec rules, LLM-era craft, and a trap catalog.
- Author
- telagod ↗
- Repository
- code-abyss ↗
- Licence
- MIT
- Last repository change
- 19.07.2026
Assessment and security
- Files in this package
- 6
- Scripts
- 0
- HTML comments
- 0
- URLs in SKILL.md
- 0
No signals detected. Repository changed on 19.07.2026, without references to retired models or APIs.
MIT, open: use and modify while retaining author attribution.
What it does and when to use it
Machine learning and LLM engineering judgment, distilled from a stronger model - invoke when DECIDING whether/how to use ML or an LLM for a task (prompt vs RAG vs fine-tune vs classical); working with training/eval data or labels; building or reviewing evals for models and LLM features; designing RAG, structured output, or agent pipelines; or diagnosing why a model/LLM feature underperforms. Method-selection ladder, data and leakage discipline, eval-as-spec rules, LLM-era craft, and a trap catalog.
Original author description
Machine learning and LLM engineering judgment, distilled from a stronger model - invoke when DECIDING whether/how to use ML or an LLM for a task (prompt vs RAG vs fine-tune vs classical); working with training/eval data or labels; building or reviewing evals for models and LLM features; designing RAG, structured output, or agent pipelines; or diagnosing why a model/LLM feature underperforms. Method-selection ladder, data and leakage discipline, eval-as-spec rules, LLM-era craft, and a trap catalog.
How it works
- Route by moment
- Scope and neighbors
- The stance
SKILL.md preview
--- user-invocable: false name: ml description: Machine learning and LLM engineering judgment, distilled from a stronger model - invoke when DECIDING whether/how to use ML or an LLM for a task (prompt vs RAG vs fine-tune vs classical); working with training/eval data or labels; building or reviewing evals for models and LLM features; designing RAG, structured output, or agent pipelines; or diagnosing why a model/LLM feature underperforms. Method-selection ladder, data and leakage discipline, eval-as-spec rules, LLM-era craft, and a trap catalog. --- # ML — approach, data, evals, LLM craft, traps Rule content lives in the five files below; this SKILL.md only routes (`doctrine/04-maintenance.md` governs edits to this bundle too). ## Route by moment | You are about to… | Read (in this folder) | |---|---| | Decide whether ML/an LLM is warranted, and which method rung to use | `approach.md` | | Touch a dataset, labels, or splits; suspect a score is too good | `data.md` | | Define success, build/judge an eval, or assess someone's metric claim | `evals.md` | | Build with LLMs: prompts, RAG, structured output, agents, model choice | `llm.md` | | Diagnose an underperforming model or LLM feature | `data.md` §1 first (read real failures), then `llm.md` §3 if RAG, `traps.md` to name the pattern | | Review an ML project's health; name why a claim or pipeline smells wrong | `traps.md` | A new ML feature usually runs `approach.md` (interrogate + pick the rung) → `evals.md` §1 (eval BEFORE build) → `data.md` → then `llm.md` if the rung is LLM-shaped → skim `traps.md` §C before finalizing any launch or monitoring plan. ## Scope and neighbors Modeling and evaluation judgment. The serving infrastructure around a model is ordinary backend (`backend` bundle: APIs, queues, operate.md); experiment execution discipline is `methods` (investigate/verify); whether to delegate → `doctrine`. ## The stance **The eval is the spec; anything unmeasured is folklore.** Look at the data with your own eyes (`data.md` §1), climb the method ladder from the cheapest rung (`approach.md` §3), and treat every surprising score as leakage until disproven (`data.md` §2). The failure mode of this field is not bad models — it is unearned confidence in numbers.
Files in this package (6)
- SKILL.md 2 KB
- approach.md 4 KB
- data.md 3 KB
- evals.md 4 KB
- llm.md 4 KB
- traps.md 4 KB
Versions
| Repository | Score | Licence |
|---|---|---|
| This page · telagod/code-abyss | 85 | MIT |
| quantskills/agent-quantspace | 95 | GPL-3.0 |
Database snapshot: 13.11.2026 · package version 5feeb754ff27 (SHA-256 digest of the entire package)
Downloads in the last 30 days: 0 · ranking
Report a problem with this skill: harmful content, incorrect descriptions or an author’s removal request.
Similar skills
- 100ai-playbook
Production-grade decision framework for building AI features, AI workflows, AI agents, and AI-augmented systems. Use this skill whenever the user is designing, building, debugging, reviewing, or deciding whether to add AI to a system — including any work involving LLM calls,… - 100sota-llm-engineering
State-of-the-art LLM application engineering rules for BUILDING and AUDITING LLM-powered features. Claude should use this skill whenever it is building, modifying, or reviewing anything that calls a language model — chat features, RAG pipelines, agents and tool use, structured… - 100llm-app-engineering
Build reliable LLM-powered features: prompts, structured output, RAG, tool use, evals, cost and latency, safety. Use when integrating or reviewing LLM, agent or retrieval features in an application. - 95agentic
AI/LLM engineering patterns. Triggers when building agents, prompts, MCP servers, evals, or RAG. Model selection, caching, tool design, multi-agent orchestration. - 100evals
Build and run evaluations for LLM features, prompts, agents, and RAG pipelines — golden datasets, assertions, LLM-as-judge graders, regression gates in CI, A/B comparison of prompts or models. Use whenever someone changes a prompt, swaps a model, ships an AI feature, asks \"is… - 100ai-engineer
AI/LLM Application Engineer (/ai) — builds LLM-powered product features: RAG, agentic workflows, prompt engineering, tool use, structured output, evals, and guardrails. Use when implementing AI features in an app — a chatbot, RAG over docs, an agent, a summarizer, semantic…