hackathon
/hackathon
Hackathon playbook for Claude Code - understand the judges, minimal spec, evals first, parallel workstreams, audits and demo. Use when the user enters a hackathon or a challenge with a deadline and judges, or runs /alexis:hackathon.
- Author
- diegoaguilar2209 ↗
- Repository
- alexis ↗
- Licence
- MIT
- Last repository change
- 30.10.2026
Assessment and security
- Files in this package
- 1
- Scripts
- 0
- HTML comments
- 0
- URLs in SKILL.md
- 0
No signals detected. Repository changed on 30.10.2026, without references to retired models or APIs.
MIT, open: use and modify while retaining author attribution.
What it does and when to use it
Hackathon playbook for Claude Code - understand the judges, minimal spec, evals first, parallel workstreams, audits and demo. Use when the user enters a hackathon or a challenge with a deadline and judges, or runs /alexis:hackathon.
Arguments
/hackathon [event name and deadline]
Original author description
Hackathon playbook for Claude Code - understand the judges, minimal spec, evals first, parallel workstreams, audits and demo. Use when the user enters a hackathon or a challenge with a deadline and judges, or runs /alexis:hackathon.
How it works
- 0. Time budget
- 1. Understand the judges
- 2. Minimal spec (one page max)
- 3. Evals first
- 4. End-to-end skeleton
- 5. Parallel build
- 6. Audit
- 7. Demo
- Rules
SKILL.md preview
---
name: hackathon
description: Hackathon playbook for Claude Code - understand the judges, minimal spec, evals first, parallel workstreams, audits and demo. Use when the user enters a hackathon or a challenge with a deadline and judges, or runs /alexis:hackathon.
argument-hint: "[event name and deadline]"
---
# Hackathon mode
Based on what winners of the Claude Code "Built with Opus" hackathons did: spec before code, evals from the first commit, parallel work by domain, and time reserved for the demo. Reply in the user's language.
## 0. Time budget
From the deadline, split the total time and write it to `docs/hackathon-plan.md`:
| Phase | % of time |
| --- | --- |
| Understand the judges + spec | 15% |
| Eval + end-to-end skeleton | 15% |
| Parallel build | 45% |
| Audit and polish | 10% |
| Demo (video, README, pitch) | 15% |
## 1. Understand the judges
- Read the rules and judging criteria. Turn each criterion into a question the demo must answer.
- Define the "wow moment" in one sentence: what the judges see in the first 30 seconds.
- Pick a real problem the user knows deeply. Winners solved problems from their own domain.
## 2. Minimal spec (one page max)
Problem, user, wow moment, minimal demonstrable scope, out of scope, Mermaid architecture. Use `superpowers:brainstorming` if installed.
## 3. Evals first
Before any feature: `evals/cases.md` with 8-12 real cases and expected results, plus a script that runs them and prints a score. That number decides what works, not intuition.
## 4. End-to-end skeleton
An ugly but complete version (data → logic → interface) before deepening any part.
## 5. Parallel build
Split by domain (data, agent, UI, demo). Each domain in its own worktree with clean context: `alexis-wt data "<task>"`, `alexis-wt agent "<task>"`, one tmux window each. For long unattended stretches use `/alexis:autopilot` inside a worktree. Merge to `main` at least twice a day.
## 6. Audit
Before each new block, ask the `verifier` subagent to audit what exists against the spec and the eval ("what is wrong or missing?"). Fix before moving on.
## 7. Demo
- README: problem, demo GIF or video, how to run, architecture, eval results.
- Video max 3 minutes: problem (20 s), wow moment (60 s), how it works (60 s), impact (20 s).
- Reserve the last stretch only for this: it always takes longer than expected.
## Rules
- If Claude says something will not fit in the time, check it against the plan; sometimes it does fit.
- No features outside the minimal scope until the eval and the demo exist.
- Watch the 5-hour usage window on subscription plans: plan heavy parallel work right after a reset (the ALEXIS status line shows when it resets).
Versions
| Repository | Score | Licence |
|---|---|---|
| This page · diegoaguilar2209/alexis | 90 | MIT |
| chaingpt-org/chaingpt-claude-skill | 100 | MIT |
Database snapshot: 13.11.2026 · package version e2f0739a298b (SHA-256 digest of the entire package)
Downloads in the last 30 days: 0 · ranking
Report a problem with this skill: harmful content, incorrect descriptions or an author’s removal request.
Similar skills
- 95hackathon-ai
黑客松 AI 执行流程:rails 文档体系、scope 裁决、时间轴门禁、验证闭环、demo 与提交。Use when the user says 黑客松 / hackathon / 48小时比赛 / demo day / 参赛项目 / 提交 Devpost / 打比赛做产品,或要在极短时限内用 AI agent 从零交付一个可演示系统。 - 90Hedera Hackathon PRD
This skill should be used when the user wants to plan a Hedera hackathon project, create a PRD, write a project spec, brainstorm a hackathon idea, or structure their hackathon submission. Triggered by phrases like "hackathon project plan", "hackathon PRD", "plan my hackathon… - 100hackathon-strategist
あらゆるハッカソンを攻略するための戦略立案・アイディア出し・設計・ピッチ準備を 包括的に支援するスキル。リーンスタートアップ手法とハッカソン勝利パターンを統合。 Use when the user asks to: - Prepare for a hackathon / ハッカソンの準備 / 作戦を立てる - Generate hackathon ideas / アイディア出し / テーマ選定 - Plan hackathon architecture or MVP / アーキテクチャ設計 / MVP設計 - Prepare a hackathon… - 100hackathon-ideas
Find, cut and rank hackathon project ideas that solve a real, specific problem at its root, against a specific hackathon's rules, tracks, judging criteria, required tech and deadline. Use when choosing what to build for a hackathon, or when comparing or stress-testing candidate hackathon ideas. - 90Hedera Hackathon Submission Validator
This skill should be used when the user wants to validate, review, or score their Hedera hackathon submission before submitting. Triggered by phrases like "validate hackathon submission", "review my hackathon project", "hackathon scorecard", "check submission readiness", "score… - 100hackathon-brief-design
Write the hackathon challenge document teams read before they build - problem statements sized to the time box, thematic challenge tracks, the published rules and eligibility text, the submission-artifact checklist, sponsor-challenge framing, and naming (never weighting) the…