frd-method
/frd-method
Extract, validate, reconcile, approve, version and verify evidence-bound functional requirements documents in docs/frd/. TRIGGER WHEN: the user asks for an evidence-bound FRD, requirements and domain references must be extracted from project sources, a fresh extraction must be reconciled with manual review, or an FRD needs approval, revision or verification. DO NOT TRIGGER WHEN: recording an architecture or technical decision (use project-delivery:adr-method), writing general project documentation without evidence spans, or treating current implementation as an automatically approved requireme
- Author
- acaprino ↗
- Repository
- alfio-claude-plugins ↗
- Licence
- MIT
- Last repository change
- 27.10.2026
Assessment and security
- Files in this package
- 4
- Scripts
- 1
- HTML comments
- 0
- URLs in SKILL.md
- 0
No signals detected. Repository changed on 27.10.2026, without references to retired models or APIs.
MIT, open: use and modify while retaining author attribution.
- 1 scripts in this package. Review them before installing, as Claude may execute them.
Scripts: scripts/frd_tool.py
What it does and when to use it
Extract, validate, reconcile, approve, version and verify evidence-bound functional requirements documents in docs/frd/. TRIGGER WHEN: the user asks for an evidence-bound FRD, requirements and domain references must be extracted from project sources, a fresh extraction must be reconciled with manual review, or an FRD needs approval, revision or verification. DO NOT TRIGGER WHEN: recording an architecture or technical decision (use project-delivery:adr-method), writing general project documentation without evidence spans, or treating current implementation as an automatically approved requireme
Original author description
Extract, validate, reconcile, approve, version and verify evidence-bound functional requirements documents in docs/frd/. TRIGGER WHEN: the user asks for an evidence-bound FRD, requirements and domain references must be extracted from project sources, a fresh extraction must be reconciled with manual review, or an FRD needs approval, revision or verification. DO NOT TRIGGER WHEN: recording an architecture or technical decision (use project-delivery:adr-method), writing general project documentation without evidence spans, or treating current implementation as an automatically approved requireme
How it works
- Grounded extraction
- Load map
- Reconciliation and approval
SKILL.md preview
--- name: frd-method description: > Extract, validate, reconcile, approve, version and verify evidence-bound functional requirements documents in docs/frd/. TRIGGER WHEN: the user asks for an evidence-bound FRD, requirements and domain references must be extracted from project sources, a fresh extraction must be reconciled with manual review, or an FRD needs approval, revision or verification. DO NOT TRIGGER WHEN: recording an architecture or technical decision (use project-delivery:adr-method), writing general project documentation without evidence spans, or treating current implementation as an automatically approved requirement. --- > `<plugin-root>` names this plugin's directory inside the installed package, the one that holds its `skills/`, `agents/` and `commands/`. The loader substitutes it in every body it registers; in any other file, resolve it once from where that file was loaded. <daodan_host_binding host="opencode"> This binding governs execution of this package and its loaded references. It takes precedence over executable examples written for another host. Use only registered tools and their actual input schema; an example never creates a tool, argument, permission, model alias or nested worker capability. Preserve the generated worker allowlist, dependency closure, scope and delivery contracts. OpenCode V2 binding: repository reads use read/glob/grep, writes use write/edit/patch, shell execution uses shell, network tools are webfetch/websearch, and clarification uses the registered question tool. shell takes command, optional workdir, timeout in milliseconds and background. It does not provide interactive stdin. Persistent capture uses background: true and an explicit noninteractive stop signal. Load skills with skill using id: "<plugin>:<skill>". Dispatch registered roles with subagent using agent: "<owner>:<role>", description and prompt; optional sessionID continues that child, and background: true requests asynchronous completion. Use only roles allowed by the current harness and permissions. A child cannot dispatch nested workers when its permissions or the configured depth deny it. Workflow entries are /<plugin>:<workflow>, registered by the package loader. Inherit the session model; an override requires its authorized, actually available provider/model identity, not another host's short model alias. The loader includes required local providers and registers plugin-declared MCP servers. Qualified foreign providers need a compatible V2 plugin/skill provisioned through this host, never a Claude marketplace command. Check the active registry: registration metadata alone does not prove a connected server or usable tool. Inherit the active session's model and default variant. A source model alias such as sonnet is not a portable override; request a different model only through an explicit adapter mapping to a valid host identity and user authorization. The executing agent and its coordinator own continuation, recovery, verification and delivery. Skills supply knowledge and method instructions; they are not executors or a runtime persistence mechanism. Resolve each component by kind and exact installed identity. A role is dispatched as a worker, a skill loads instructions, and a workflow starts its declared method. Kernel owner-qualified skill references are logical provider identities: resolve them to the actual host registry name and verified installed provider path. Do not invent a registry string by adding an owner's prefix when the host does not use it. Do not load an agent identity as a skill or execute a workflow name as a shell command. Declared required foreign providers remain mandatory. If a required provider or capability (including required MCP access or isolation) is unavailable, stop its dependent phase and report the missing capability. Optional external providers follow the method's declared selection and absence behavior; their absence alone does not block the base workflow. Report any explicitly requested but unavailable provider contribution as unfulfilled and continue independent work. Do not install a different host's plugin or substitute unrelated skills to claim coverage. Shell execution alone does not establish interactive stdin. Before a capture or checkpoint, use an available session-control mechanism. When stdin is unavailable, keep user-driven capture in a supported background process with bounded output and an explicit stop signal controlled by the coordinator after the user's completion message. Close owned browser/process resources on completion or cancellation. Continue working within the current authorization while the requested result is achievable. After a tool error, inspect its cause, correct the relevant input or implementation, retry when justified and verify the outcome; never repeat a failing action blindly. Do not close the turn with a promise or a partial result when an authorized next step can still produce or verify the requested result. Stop only for a documented real impediment, a missing required capability, an unresolved human decision or the caller's stop request. At that boundary, report completed results, remaining work and the concrete prerequisite for continuation; continue any independent work that the blocker does not prevent. A tool's successful exit, a worker stop or an idle session is not the deliverable. Return final text naming observed findings, artifact paths, executed checks and blockers. An empty worker result is missing delivery: inspect or resume that worker when permitted, or record failure. Verify required artifacts and candidate gates before marking the requested outcome complete. This is an execution binding, not a rewrite of source examples. Preserve programming language fences, domain code and host APIs that are the subject of marketplace-ops or agent-sdk-builder. A host-as-subject API is not a tool provided to this session. Compiled binding and static checks do not prove an installed host executed a run. </daodan_host_binding> # Evidence-bound functional requirements Load `work-controller:work-record` for run ownership and authorization. Read `references/frd-schema.md` before constructing or changing extraction data. The helper is `python "<plugin-root>/skills/frd-method/scripts/frd_tool.py"`. It writes only the FRD records and their generated index. ## Grounded extraction Before substantive claims, load `research:science-based-approach` and compose its automatic checkpoint. In the schema, scientific evidence requires a pinned local revision, exact digest and Unicode excerpt, never just a URL. Keep needs, hypotheses, observations and support separate. Unauthorized publication leaves a named gap. Evidence never approves or rewrites an Accepted FRD. 1. Establish behavior, actors and scope from the request and interview; keep current, documented and requested behavior distinct. 2. Inspect code and documents. Use Codebase Map to locate evidence, then read cited source; the map is static navigation, not correctness or runtime proof. 3. Record requirements, entities and relationships with exact Unicode spans; report contradictions and runtime gaps. 4. Write extraction JSON and run `propose`. Records and items remain `Proposed` and `extracted`, never approved or verified. Evidence must point to a project-relative file and match its current byte digest and exact `[start,end)` excerpt. Do not cite an inaccessible, stale or inferred span. Do not put secrets in excerpts. ## Load map | Step | Run | |---|---| | Before using records | `validate --project ROOT` | | New FRD | `propose --project ROOT --title T --slug S --task TASK --sha SHA --data FILE` | | Revise Accepted | `propose --project ROOT --revise FRD-NNNN --task TASK --sha SHA --data FILE --expect-digest D` | | Reconcile extraction | `merge --project ROOT --frd FRD-NNNN --data FILE --expect-digest D` | | Review or correct an item | `resolve --project ROOT --frd FRD-NNNN --item ID --status verified\|corrected\|rejected --expect-digest D [--data FILE]` | | Resolve a disagreement | the same `resolve`, adding `--conflict CONFLICT-NNNN` | | Exact text approved by user | `promote --project ROOT --frd FRD-NNNN --sha SHA --expect-digest D` | | Reviewer confirmed conformance | `verify --project ROOT --frd FRD-NNNN --sha SHA --expect-digest D` | | Repair a stale index | `index --project ROOT` | Use `validate --frd FRD-NNNN` to obtain the current Proposed and Accepted versions and their digests. Every mutation of an existing record is optimistic: read the exact record, then pass its digest. A mismatch means read and review the new bytes rather than retrying blindly. ## Reconciliation and approval `merge` never deletes missing items or overwrites semantic changes. It unions new evidence, preserves `verified`, `corrected` and `rejected` review states, and opens conflicts when extraction disagrees with an existing item. Resolve each conflict explicitly. A manual correction uses complete item JSON and fresh valid evidence. Promotion refuses unresolved conflicts. Show the exact candidate and digest to the user. Call `promote` only after the user explicitly approves that candidate. Never auto-approve because validation passed, sources agree, a map contains a claim, or an implementation already exists. Promotion accepts the FRD and supersedes its previous version; it does not verify implementation. Only a separate reviewer conformance check justifies `verify` and `last_verified_sha`.
Files in this package (4)
- SKILL.md 9 KB
- SKILL.toml 1 KB
- references/frd-schema.md 11 KB
- scripts/frd_tool.py 35 KB
Versions
| Repository | Score | Licence |
|---|---|---|
| This page · acaprino/alfio-claude-plugins | 100 | MIT |
| acaprino/alfio-claude-plugins | 100 | MIT |
| acaprino/alfio-claude-plugins | 100 | MIT |
| acaprino/alfio-claude-plugins | 100 | MIT |
| acaprino/alfio-claude-plugins | 100 | MIT |
| acaprino/alfio-claude-plugins | 90 | MIT |
Identical content appears in 1 other GitHub folders. We show one copy with the highest score.
Database snapshot: 13.11.2026 · package version ce1dddc39541 (SHA-256 digest of the entire package)
Downloads in the last 30 days: 0 · ranking
Report a problem with this skill: harmful content, incorrect descriptions or an author’s removal request.
Similar skills
- 85project-bootstrap
Draft missing ADR and FRD from verified project evidence without turning legacy behavior or stale documentation into approved requirements. TRIGGER WHEN: a project has no ADR or FRD, existing project knowledge must be bootstrapped from code, documentation or Codebase Map, or… - 100frd-writer
Write a Functional Requirements Document. Use when the user says "write an FRD", "functional requirements", "system requirements", "SRS", "what should the system do", "document the functional specs", "software requirements specification", "detailed requirements for engineering",… - 95project-bootstrap
Draft missing ADR and FRD from verified project evidence without turning legacy behavior or stale documentation into approved requirements. TRIGGER WHEN: a project has no ADR or FRD, existing project knowledge must be bootstrapped from code, documentation or Codebase Map, or… - 90frd
Create or revise a Feature Requirement Document (FRD) for this repository. Use only when the user explicitly asks to create, draft, or revise an FRD or Feature Requirement Document, or explicitly invokes this skill. Do not trigger for ordinary feature implementation, new skills,… - 100frd-review
Review Feature Requirements Documents (FRDs) (single file or full tree) against the Overview / Terminology / Requirements template, source-of-truth rules, module boundaries, downstream impact, and the parent-delivers-value rule for sub-features. Writes a review file. Use when… - 100frd-getting-started
Produce the initial set of Feature Requirements Documents (FRDs) for a new project. Calibrates between an agile first pass (small set of must-have features only) and a waterfall first pass (comprehensive coverage). Asks how many features to draft, identifies them from the…