devops-network-infrastructure
/devops-network-infrastructure
Use this skill when designing or operating production network infrastructure: BGP, anycast, ECMP, leaf-spine fabric, EVPN/VXLAN, MPLS, SD-WAN, VRRP/HSRP/CARP, jumbo frames, QoS, multi-WAN, NAT, IPv6 dual-stack, transit-vs-peering, internet exchanges (IX). Applies to colo, on-prem DC, hybrid cloud, and edge POPs. This skill enforces: redundant uplinks, BGP best-practice (origin AS, prefix filtering, MED/LOCAL_PREF policy), leaf-spine non-blocking, MTU consistency, and verifiable failover. Do NOT use for: cloud-native VPC/Transit Gateway (see devops-aws / devops-gcp / devops-azure), service mesh
- Author
- j4flmao ↗
- Repository
- agent-skills ↗
- Licence
- MIT
- Last repository change
- 10.10.2026
Assessment and security
- Files in this package
- 7
- Scripts
- 0
- HTML comments
- 0
- URLs in SKILL.md
- 0
No signals detected. Repository changed on 10.10.2026, without references to retired models or APIs.
MIT, open: use and modify while retaining author attribution.
What it does and when to use it
Use this skill when designing or operating production network infrastructure: BGP, anycast, ECMP, leaf-spine fabric, EVPN/VXLAN, MPLS, SD-WAN, VRRP/HSRP/CARP, jumbo frames, QoS, multi-WAN, NAT, IPv6 dual-stack, transit-vs-peering, internet exchanges (IX). Applies to colo, on-prem DC, hybrid cloud, and edge POPs. This skill enforces: redundant uplinks, BGP best-practice (origin AS, prefix filtering, MED/LOCAL_PREF policy), leaf-spine non-blocking, MTU consistency, and verifiable failover. Do NOT use for: cloud-native VPC/Transit Gateway (see devops-aws / devops-gcp / devops-azure), service mesh
Original author description
Use this skill when designing or operating production network infrastructure: BGP, anycast, ECMP, leaf-spine fabric, EVPN/VXLAN, MPLS, SD-WAN, VRRP/HSRP/CARP, jumbo frames, QoS, multi-WAN, NAT, IPv6 dual-stack, transit-vs-peering, internet exchanges (IX). Applies to colo, on-prem DC, hybrid cloud, and edge POPs. This skill enforces: redundant uplinks, BGP best-practice (origin AS, prefix filtering, MED/LOCAL_PREF policy), leaf-spine non-blocking, MTU consistency, and verifiable failover. Do NOT use for: cloud-native VPC/Transit Gateway (see devops-aws / devops-gcp / devops-azure), service mesh
How it works
- Purpose
- Agent Protocol
- Architecture Decision Trees
- Quick Start
- Core Workflow
- Anti-Patterns
- Production Considerations
- Security Considerations
- Rules
- References
SKILL.md preview
---
name: devops-network-infrastructure
description: >
Use this skill when designing or operating production network infrastructure: BGP, anycast, ECMP,
leaf-spine fabric, EVPN/VXLAN, MPLS, SD-WAN, VRRP/HSRP/CARP, jumbo frames, QoS, multi-WAN, NAT,
IPv6 dual-stack, transit-vs-peering, internet exchanges (IX). Applies to colo, on-prem DC, hybrid
cloud, and edge POPs. This skill enforces: redundant uplinks, BGP best-practice (origin AS, prefix
filtering, MED/LOCAL_PREF policy), leaf-spine non-blocking, MTU consistency, and verifiable failover.
Do NOT use for: cloud-native VPC/Transit Gateway (see devops-aws / devops-gcp / devops-azure),
service mesh (see devops-service-mesh), or app-level load balancing (see enterprise-high-availability).
version: "2.0.0"
author: "j4flmao"
license: "MIT"
compatibility:
claude-code: true
cursor: true
codex: true
windsurf: true
tags: [devops, network, bgp, anycast, leaf-spine, phase-2]
---
# DevOps Network Infrastructure
## Purpose
Design networks that survive single-link, single-device, single-carrier, single-POP failures while
delivering wire-rate throughput. Cover BGP for multi-homing and anycast, leaf-spine for east-west
scale, EVPN/VXLAN for L2 stretch, MPLS / SD-WAN for branch, and VRRP/HSRP for L2 redundancy.
## Agent Protocol
### Trigger
Exact user phrases: "BGP", "anycast", "ECMP", "leaf-spine", "EVPN", "VXLAN", "MPLS", "SD-WAN",
"VRRP", "HSRP", "CARP", "multi-homing", "transit", "peering", "IX", "internet exchange", "AS number",
"prefix filter", "MED", "LOCAL_PREF", "DDoS scrubbing", "blackhole route", "jumbo frames", "MTU",
"network fabric", "spine", "leaf", "Clos", "QoS".
### Input Context
- Current topology + scale (rack count, links)
- Carrier mix (transit, peering, IX)
- Own AS number? PI / PA address space?
- Workloads (east-west heavy: storage / k8s; north-south heavy: web; both)
- Geographic POPs / regions / sites
- Compliance / latency requirements
### Output Artifact
Network design with topology diagram, addressing, BGP policy, MTU plan, redundancy proof.
### Response Format
```
Topology: {leaf-spine | hub-spoke | full-mesh}
Underlay: {BGP unnumbered | OSPF | ISIS}
Overlay: {EVPN/VXLAN | none}
North-south: {2+ transit, ≥1 IX, BGP multi-home}
Failure domains: {rack / row / pod}
MTU: {core 9216, edge 1500}
```
No preamble. No postamble. No explanations.
### Completion Criteria
- [ ] Redundant uplinks (≥ 2 carriers; ≥ 2 fiber entries to building)
- [ ] BGP policy: prefix filter, AS path filter, RPKI ROA validation
- [ ] Anycast for stateless services where applicable
- [ ] Leaf-spine sized for non-blocking fabric (oversubscription documented)
- [ ] L2 redundancy via MLAG/VPC + VRRP/HSRP
- [ ] Consistent MTU policy across underlay
- [ ] IPv6 dual-stack
- [ ] Monitoring: BGP neighbor state, interface errors, throughput
## Architecture Decision Trees
### Fabric Topology Selection
| Topology | East-West BW | Scalability | Cost | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leaf-spine (Clos) | Excellent | 1000s of nodes | Medium-High | Modern DC, storage, K8s |
| Hub-spoke | Poor | <100 nodes | Low | Branch offices, small DC |
| Full-mesh | Excellent | <8 nodes | Low (small) | Small clusters only |
| 3-stage Clos | Excellent | ~500 racks | Medium | Most DC deployments |
| 5-stage Clos | Excellent | 1000+ racks | High | Hyperscale |
### Underlay Routing Protocol Comparison
| Protocol | Convergence | Complexity | ECMP | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BGP unnumbered | Sub-second (BFD) | Low | Yes (up to 128-way) | Modern DC, FRR/SONiC |
| OSPF | Seconds | Low | Yes (up to 32-way) | Small-medium, classic |
| ISIS | Sub-second | Medium | Yes (up to 128-way) | ISP, hyperscale |
| Static | None | Lowest | No | Edge, simple branches |
### BGP Route Policy Decision Tree
```
Ingress preference:
Is peer at IX?
├── Yes → LOCAL_PREF 200 (cheaper peering)
└── No → Is peer transit?
├── Yes → LOCAL_PREF 100 (paid transit)
└── No → LOCAL_PREF 50 (backup)
Egress preference:
Is prefix ours?
├── Yes → MED 100, prepend AS once
└── No → Do we need AS prepend?
├── Yes → prepend 2-3 times for less-preferred path
└── No → standard MED
```
### Overlay Protocol Comparison
| Protocol | L2 Stretch | L3 Isolation | Control-Plane | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EVPN/VXLAN | Yes | 16M VNIs | BGP MP-BGP | Multi-tenant DC |
| VLAN | Yes | 4094 VLANs | STP/RSTP | Simple L2 networks |
| MPLS L3VPN | No | Yes | LDP/RSVP-TE | ISP, WAN |
| VXLAN (static) | Yes | 16M VNIs | Static | Simple overlay |
| Geneve | Yes | 16M+ VNIs | EVPN | Modern, extensible |
### Network Vendor Comparison
| Vendor | Switching | Routing | Automation | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arista | EOS VXLAN/EVPN | BGP, ISIS | CloudVision, eAPI | DC leaf-spine |
| Cisco Nexus | NX-OS VXLAN/EVPN | BGP, OSPF | NX-API, Ansible | Enterprise DC |
| Juniper | Junos EVPN | BGP, ISIS | PyEZ, Ansible | ISP, large DC |
| FRR (Linux) | Linux bridge | BGP, OSPF | Ansible, Cumulus | White-box, DIY |
| SONiC | Switch abstraction | BGP | Redis DB, K8s | Hyperscale, OCP |
| Aruba CX | VSX, EVPN | BGP, OSPF | AOS-CX Ansible | Campus + DC |
## Quick Start
Leaf-spine topology → BGP unnumbered underlay → EVPN/VXLAN overlay (if needed) → BGP multi-homing for north-south → Anycast for DNS/API → VRRP for L2 redundancy → MTU 9216 core → Monitoring with Prometheus + SNMP.
## Core Workflow
### Step 1: Pick Fabric Topology
```
Leaf-spine (Clos)
All leaves connect to all spines. East-west predictable. Most modern DCs.
Scale: add more spines/leaves; non-blocking with right oversub ratio.
Hub-spoke
One core, many edges. Good for small / branch; bad for east-west.
Full-mesh
All-to-all links. Only for small clusters; doesn't scale beyond ~8 nodes.
3-stage Clos (leaf-spine) small/medium DC
5-stage Clos (super-spine added) hyperscale (1000s of racks)
```
```
Spine-1 Spine-2 Spine-3 Spine-4
│ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │
╳ ╳ ╳ ╳ ╳ ╳ ╳ ╳ ╳ ╳ ╳ ╳
│ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │
Leaf-1 Leaf-2 Leaf-3 … Leaf-N
(ToR) (ToR) (ToR) (ToR)
│ │ │ │
Rack Rack Rack Rack
```
Oversubscription: total leaf-to-server bw : total leaf-to-spine bw.
- 1:1 non-blocking (max performance, max cost)
- 3:1 typical compute
- 5:1+ acceptable for general workloads, not for storage
### Step 2: Underlay Routing
```
BGP unnumbered (FRR / Cumulus / SONiC) modern, no need to manage per-link IPs
OSPF classic, simpler scale
ISIS ISP-grade, used by hyperscalers
```
BGP-only DCs (Hyperscale pattern):
- Each leaf in its own ASN, each spine in its own ASN (or shared)
- ECMP across all uplinks (FRR / Arista EOS supports)
- Loopback IPs for router-id; underlay via /31 or unnumbered
### Step 3: Overlay (if multi-tenant L2 needed)
```
EVPN/VXLAN
L2 stretch over L3 underlay. Tenant separation via VNI.
Type-2 MAC routes via BGP. Type-5 IP prefix routes for inter-VNI.
Use only if you NEED L2 stretch (legacy apps, vMotion, multi-AZ cluster requiring same subnet).
Modern apps prefer L3-everywhere.
```
### Step 4: North-South — Multi-Homing + BGP
Get your own ASN + PI space for control. Multi-home to ≥ 2 transit + 1+ IX.
```
You (AS 65001)
│ │
Transit-A Transit-B
(Cogent) (Lumen)
IX-1 (private peering: Cloudflare, Google, AWS, Meta)
eBGP to all 3. Outbound: LOCAL_PREF to prefer peering > transit (cheaper).
Inbound: AS-prepend for less-preferred ingress; MED only with same neighbor.
```
```bash
router bgp 65001
bgp router-id 198.51.100.1
neighbor 192.0.2.1 remote-as 174 ! Cogent
neighbor 192.0.2.5 remote-as 3356 ! Lumen
address-family ipv4 unicast
network 198.51.100.0/24
neighbor 192.0.2.1 prefix-list out-default out
neighbor 192.0.2.1 route-map prefer-peer in
neighbor 192.0.2.5 prefix-list out-default out
```
### Step 5: Anycast
Same IP announced from multiple POPs. BGP withdraws on failure → traffic shifts in seconds.
Use cases: DNS (root + recursive), Anycast HTTPS (CDN-style), Multi-region API gateway.
Requirement: stateless or session-portable workload (anycast may hop mid-conn under churn).
### Step 6: L2 Redundancy (within a rack/row)
```
MLAG / VPC two switches act as one LACP partner
servers LACP-bond two NICs to two switches
survives one switch loss seamlessly
VRRP / HSRP virtual IP shared by switch pair as default gateway
sub-second failover
```
```
interface Vlan100
ip address 10.10.0.2 255.255.255.0
vrrp 1 ip 10.10.0.1
vrrp 1 priority 110
vrrp 1 preempt
```
### Step 7: MTU + Jumbo Frames
```
1500 default Ethernet MTU
1380 safe for VPN encap (1500 - IPSec overhead)
9000 jumbo for storage / east-west (Ceph, iSCSI, NFS)
9216 modern jumbo limit (handles VXLAN + jumbo payload)
```
Rule: end-to-end consistency. One link at 1500 in a 9000 path = silent fragmentation / blackhole.
Verify with `ping -M do -s 8972` (don't-fragment).
### Step 8: BGP Configuration — Arista EOS
```eos
! Arista EOS leaf switch BGP config
router bgp 65001
router-id 10.0.0.1
maximum-paths 4 ecmp 128
neighbor SPINE-PEERS peer-group
neighbor SPINE-PEERS remote-as 65000
neighbor SPINE-PEERS bfd
neighbor SPINE-PEERS timers 3 9
neighbor SPINE-PEERS route-map FROM-SPINE in
neighbor SPINE-PEERS route-map TO-SPINE out
neighbor 10.0.1.0 peer-group SPINE-PEERS
neighbor 10.0.1.1 peer-group SPINE-PEERS
neighbor 10.0.1.2 peer-group SPINE-PEERS
neighbor 10.0.1.3 peer-group SPINE-PEERS
!
address-family ipv4
neighbor SPINE-PEERS activate
network 10.0.0.1/32
network 198.51.100.0/24
!
address-family evpn
neighbor SPINE-PEERS activate
advertise all-vni
```
### Step 9: EVPN/VXLAN Configuration — Arista
```eos
! Configure VXLAN on leaf
interface Vxlan1
description EVPN VXLAN overlay
vxlan source-interface Loopback0
vxlan udp-port 4789
vxlan vlan 100 vni 10100
vxlan vlan 200 vni 10200
vxlan vlan 300 vni 10300
vxlan learn-restrict-any-vni
vxlan flood vtep 10.0.0.2
vxlan flood vtep 10.0.0.3
vxlan flood vtep 10.0.0.4
! EVPN address-family already under BGP
! Type-2 routes for MAC/IP advertisement
! Type-5 routes for IP prefix advertisement
```
### Step 10: BGP Prefix Filtering
```bash
! RPKI-based prefix validation
route-map FROM-TRANSIT permit 10
match rpki valid
set local-preference 100
!
route-map FROM-TRANSIT permit 20
match rpki not-found
set local-preference 50
!
route-map FROM-TRANSIT deny 30
match rpki invalid
!
! Prefix filter — only accept our prefix
ip prefix-list OUR-BLOCKS seq 5 permit 198.51.100.0/24
route-map TO-TRANSIT permit 10
match ip address prefix-list OUR-BLOCKS
```
### Step 11: EVPN Multi-Homing (Ethernet Segment)
```eos
! On leaf switches connected to same server
interface Ethernet3
description Server-01 bond0
switchport access vlan 100
evpn ethernet-segment
identifier 00:01:01:00:00:01:00:00:00:01
df-election method preference
df-election preference 150 ! higher priority leaf
mpls bgp df-election include-pref-len
lacp system-id 00:01:01:00:00:01
spanning-tree portfast
```
### Step 12: Carrier Diversity
```
Tier-1: ≥ 2 transit + ≥ 2 IX peering
Fiber entry: 2 physical entries to building (different geographic paths)
Conduit: separate conduits, ideally different sides of building
Provider: avoid two carriers riding same physical fiber underneath
Test: actual run from carrier maps; insist on diverse routes in SLA
```
### Step 13: QoS and Traffic Shaping
```
Classify at edge:
EF (46): VoIP, real-time — strict priority, 5% BW
AF41 (34): video, interactive — guaranteed BW, 20%
AF31 (26): critical data, DB — guaranteed BW, 30%
AF21 (18): standard web — scavenger, 30%
BE (0): best-effort — remaining, 15%
Apply on all uplinks: shape, queue, police inbound to protect fabric.
```
### Step 14: Network Automation — Ansible
```yaml
# ansible/bgp-config.yaml
- name: Configure BGP on leaf switches
hosts: leaf_switches
gather_facts: no
vars:
leaf_asn: 65001
spine_asn: 65000
tasks:
- name: Deploy BGP config
arista.eos.eos_config:
src: bgp-leaf.j2
backup: yes
notify: save config
- name: Verify BGP neighbors
arista.eos.eos_command:
commands:
- show bgp summary | json
register: bgp_summary
failed_when: bgp_summary.stdout[0].vrfs.default.peers | length < 4
handlers:
- name: save config
arista.eos.eos_command:
commands:
- write memory
```
### Step 15: Network Automation — Nornir
```python
# nornir/bgp_check.py
from nornir import InitNornir
from nornir_netmiko import netmiko_send_command
from nornir_utils.plugins.functions import print_result
nr = InitNornir(config_file="config.yaml")
def check_bgp_peers(task):
result = task.run(
task=netmiko_send_command,
command_string="show bgp summary",
use_textfsm=True,
)
bgp_data = result[0].result
peers_up = sum(1 for p in bgp_data if p.get('state') == 'Established')
task.host["bgp_peers_up"] = peers_up
if peers_up < 4:
return f"WARNING: Only {peers_up} BGP peers established"
results = nr.run(task=check_bgp_peers)
print_result(results)
```
### Step 16: DOCSIS / Fiber OLT Access (Last Mile)
For ISPs or edge POPs, apply cable access standards. DOCSIS 3.1 supports 10G down/1G up.
GPON/XGS-PON for fiber to the home. Use BNG (Broadband Network Gateway) for subscriber management.
### Step 17: Monitoring Tools and KPIs
```
BGP neighbor state up/down + uptime + prefixes received
Interface counters errors, drops, throughput per port
ECMP hash distribution uneven = polarization, retune hash
Latency to upstream peers ping / mtr from edge to {transit, peer}
DDoS / volume anomaly netflow / sFlow / IPFIX export
Switch CPU/memory control-plane load
Fabric utilization per-spine / per-leaf link utilization
Optics DOM temperature, TX power, RX power, bias current
```
Tools: librenms, observium, Prometheus + snmp_exporter, flow collector (akvorado, pmacct),
oxidized for config backup, batfish for config validation.
## Anti-Patterns
### Anti-Pattern 1: Single-Carrier Uplink
Full outage during carrier maintenance. Always multi-home to ≥ 2 transit providers. Use BGP with LOCAL_PREF to prefer primary, prepend AS for backup path.
### Anti-Pattern 2: Mixing MTU Within a Path
One link at 1500 in a 9000 path causes silent fragmentation and blackhole connections. Verify end-to-end with `ping -M do -s 8972`. Document MTU per link in DCIM.
### Anti-Pattern 3: No BGP Filtering
Accepting full BGP table from non-transit peers. Always deploy prefix lists inbound and outbound on every eBGP session. Use RPKI ROA validation to reject invalid prefixes.
### Anti-Pattern 4: L2 Loop with STP
Spanning tree disables redundant links to prevent loops. Use MLAG/VPC for L2 redundancy instead. STP should only be a safety net, never the primary redundancy mechanism.
### Anti-Pattern 5: Oversubscription > 5:1 on Storage Fabric
Storage traffic (Ceph, iSCSI, NFS) requires predictable throughput. Oversubscription above 5:1 creates contention. Design storage fabric at 1:1 or 3:1 maximum.
### Anti-Pattern 6: Manual Config Only
Config drift, no audit trail, no rollback capability. All changes must go through NetOps automation (Ansible, Nornir, Salt). Enable config backup with oxidized.
### Anti-Pattern 7: Flat Network (No L3 Segmentation)
Broadcast storms, large blast radius, no tenant isolation. Use VLANs or VXLAN for segmentation. Route at the leaf layer — never stretch L2 across the fabric unnecessarily.
### Anti-Pattern 8: Single Fiber Entry into Building
Backhoe fade takes out entire site regardless of carrier diversity. Ensure two physical fiber entries from different geographic paths. Separate conduits and building entry points.
### Anti-Pattern 9: Ignoring ECMP Polarization
Poor hash algorithms cause uneven flow distribution across ECMP paths. Use enhanced hashing (include L4 ports, entropy fields). Test with `show ip load-sharing` on Arista/Cisco.
### Anti-Pattern 10: No BFD Configuration
BGP hold timers alone (30-120s) are too slow for modern DC failover. Always enable BFD for sub-second detection (3x 300ms = 900ms detect). Tune BGP timers to 3s keepalive, 9s hold as backup.
## Production Considerations
### High Availability
- Deploy BFD with 300ms interval for sub-second failure detection.
- Use Anycast for DNS, NTP, and stateless API gateways across POPs.
- MLAG/VPC + VRRP/HSRP for L2 device redundancy at ToR layer.
- Route reflectors at spine layer to avoid full iBGP mesh between leaves.
- Design for 50% headroom on spine uplinks during any single link failure.
- Quarterly fail-test: pull one uplink / one switch and verify auto-recovery.
### Security
- RPKI ROA published for owned prefixes; RPKI validation inbound on all eBGP sessions.
- Prefix filters on every eBGP session (in AND out).
- Max-prefix limits on all neighbor sessions to prevent route table overflow.
- Control-plane policing (CoPP) to protect switch CPU from DoS.
- MACsec for intra-fabric encryption if required by compliance.
- Management VRF for out-of-band management access.
### Performance
- ECMP across all leaf-spine uplinks; flow-hash tuned to avoid polarization.
- MTU 9216 in core, 1500 at edge, consistent within each domain.
- Use jumbo frames for storage and backup traffic (Ceph, iSCSI, NFS).
- Tune buffer allocation on spine switches for deep-buffered workloads.
- Monitor optics DOM for predictive failure detection.
### Operational Excellence
- Color-code and label both ends of every fiber patch for ops clarity.
- Use digital optical monitoring (DOM) on all optics to predict failures.
- All changes via NetOps automation, never manual on prod.
- Separate underlay (loopbacks) from overlay (VNI) addressing plan.
- Run BGP timers aggressively: 3s keepalive, 9s hold for ToR-to-spine.
- NetFlow/sFlow export from every ToR for capacity planning + DDoS detection.
## Security Considerations
| Threat | Mitigation | Implementation |
|---|---|---|
| BGP hijack | RPKI ROA + prefix filters | Route-map match rpki valid |
| Route table flooding | Max-prefix limit | `neighbor max-prefix 1000` |
| ARP spoofing | Dynamic ARP Inspection | DAI on all access VLANs |
| DHCP spoofing | DHCP Snooping | Trust uplink ports only |
| MAC flooding | Port Security + MAC limiting | `switchport port-security` |
| Control-plane DoS | CoPP | Aggregate control-plane ACL |
| Unauthorized access | AAA + management VRF | TACACS+/RADIUS on mgmt VRF |
| VLAN hopping | Disable DTP, restrict trunk | `switchport nonegotiate` |
| STP attack | BPDU Guard | `spanning-tree bpduguard enable` |
| MACsec encryption | IEEE 802.1AE | Key agreement via EAP |
## Rules
- Multi-home BGP from day one for any north-south critical traffic.
- ECMP across all leaf-spine uplinks; flow-hash tuned to avoid polarization.
- MLAG/VPC + VRRP/HSRP for L2 device redundancy.
- MTU end-to-end consistent within a domain.
- RPKI ROA published for owned prefixes; RPKI validation inbound.
- Prefix filters on every eBGP session (in AND out).
- Carrier diversity: ≥ 2 physical fiber entries, different conduits.
- IPv6 dual-stack everywhere; IPv6-only acceptable for greenfield.
- All changes via NetOps automation, never manual on prod.
- Quarterly fail-test: pull one uplink / one switch and verify auto-recovery.
- Deploy QoS classification at edge; trust boundaries on all uplinks.
- NetFlow/sFlow export from every ToR for capacity planning + DDoS detection.
## References
- references/bgp-anycast.md — BGP + Anycast — Policy, RPKI, Multi-Homing
- references/leaf-spine.md — Leaf-Spine — Clos Fabric, ECMP, EVPN/VXLAN
- references/network-infrastructure-advanced.md — Network Infrastructure Advanced Topics
- references/network-infrastructure-fundamentals.md — Network Infrastructure Fundamentals
- references/sd-wan-mpls.md — SD-WAN vs MPLS — Branch + Hybrid Connectivity
- references/vrrp-hsrp.md — L2 Redundancy — VRRP / HSRP / CARP / MLAG
- references/evpn-vxlan-deep-dive.md — EVPN/VXLAN Deep Dive
- references/bgp-automation.md — BGP Automation with Ansible
## Handoff
- `devops-datacenter` for physical cabling and patch panels.
- `devops-cdn-edge` for global anycast and DDoS scrubbing.
- `devops-cloud-architecture` for cloud VPC and Transit Gateway alongside on-prem.
- `enterprise-high-availability` for app-level LB and failover.
Files in this package (7)
- SKILL.md 20 KB
- references/bgp-anycast.md 6 KB
- references/leaf-spine.md 6 KB
- references/network-infrastructure-advanced.md 12 KB
- references/network-infrastructure-fundamentals.md 11 KB
- references/network-monitoring.md 2 KB
- references/vrrp-hsrp.md 5 KB
Versions
The database has no other skills named devops-network-infrastructure.
Database snapshot: 13.11.2026 · package version e530621a4375 (SHA-256 digest of the entire package)
Downloads in the last 30 days: 0 · ranking
Report a problem with this skill: harmful content, incorrect descriptions or an author’s removal request.
Similar skills
- 90network-backbone-architect
Design carrier- and enterprise-scale backbone networks—core/distribution/edge topology, OSPF, IS-IS, BGP and route policy, WAN/MPLS/SD-WAN, DCI, peering, transit, IX, anycast, ECMP, BFD, FRR, addressing, backbone QoS, capacity, maintenance domains, and observability (NetFlow,… - 90evpn-vxlan-fabric
EVPN/VXLAN fabric audit and troubleshooting — VTEPs, VNIs, route types, multihoming, underlay/overlay validation. Use when troubleshooting VXLAN overlay reachability, auditing leaf-spine fabric health, debugging silent hosts or asymmetric flooding, or validating anycast gateway… - 90routing-switching
Cross-platform comparison and architecture guidance for all routing and switching technologies: L2/L3 design, BGP, OSPF, STP, VLAN architecture, VXLAN/EVPN, and campus/DC fabric design. Use for \"routing protocol\", \"switching\", \"BGP vs OSPF\", \"VLAN design\", \"STP\",… - 100cisco-nxos
Expert coverage of Cisco NX-OS across all versions: Nexus 9000 data center switching, VXLAN/EVPN fabric design, vPC, spine-leaf architecture, NX-API, Nexus Dashboard, and DC security hardening. Use for \"NX-OS\", \"Nexus 9000\", \"vPC\", \"VXLAN EVPN\", \"NX-API\", \"Nexus… - 85azure-peering-service
Expert knowledge for Azure Peering Service development including limits & quotas. Use when validating prefix size, routing setup, BGP config, RPKI status, or AS number requirements, and other Azure Peering Service related development tasks. Not for Azure Internet Peering (use… - 85azure-peering-service
Expert knowledge for Azure Peering Service development including limits & quotas. Use when validating prefix size, routing setup, BGP config, RPKI status, or AS number requirements, and other Azure Peering Service related development tasks. Not for Azure Internet Peering (use…