Skip to content
Skills Library
Programming · Analysis

dev-trace

/dev-trace

Evidence-driven causal tracing with competing hypotheses. Use when an observation has multiple plausible explanations and you need to systematically rank them with evidence FOR and AGAINST each. Pairs with @trail-tracer.

Repository
evo-nexus ↗
Licence
Apache-2.0
Last repository change
12.05.2026

Assessment and security

90/ 100Class: good
Format25 / 25
Frontmatter with name and description, valid name, description up to 1,024 characters, name matching the folder.
Discoverability25 / 25
Description explains when to use the skill, has a reasonable length and uses third person.
Content25 / 35
At least 150 words and at most 500 lines, headings, step lists, examples or code.
Hygiene15 / 15
No placeholders such as TODO, no Windows paths, with a licence.
Riskno signals detected in the scan
Files in this package
1
Scripts
0
HTML comments
0
URLs in SKILL.md
0
Deprecation

No signals detected. Repository changed on 12.05.2026, without references to retired models or APIs.

Licence

Apache-2.0, otwarta: można używać i zmieniać, z zachowaniem licencji i informacji o zmianach.

What it does and when to use it

Evidence-driven causal tracing with competing hypotheses. Use when an observation has multiple plausible explanations and you need to systematically rank them with evidence FOR and AGAINST each. Pairs with @trail-tracer.

Original author description

Evidence-driven causal tracing with competing hypotheses. Use when an observation has multiple plausible explanations and you need to systematically rank them with evidence FOR and AGAINST each. Pairs with @trail-tracer.

How it works

  1. Use When
  2. Do Not Use When
  3. Workflow
  4. Output
  5. Pairs With
Original SKILL.md headings · 39 lines, 235 words
SKILL.md preview
---
name: dev-trace
description: Evidence-driven causal tracing with competing hypotheses. Use when an observation has multiple plausible explanations and you need to systematically rank them with evidence FOR and AGAINST each. Pairs with @trail-tracer.
---

# Dev Trace

Derived from oh-my-claudecode (MIT, Yeachan Heo). Adapted for the EvoNexus Engineering Layer.

Causal investigation with multi-hypothesis discipline. Generate at least 2 explanations, collect evidence FOR and AGAINST, rank by strength, end with a discriminating probe.

## Use When
- Observation has multiple plausible causes
- "Why did this happen?" — and you don't want to jump to the first answer
- Multi-causal problem (intermittent bugs, regional anomalies, performance puzzles)
- Need to preserve uncertainty rather than collapse to one answer prematurely

## Do Not Use When
- Cause is obvious → just fix it via `@hawk-debugger`
- Single-cause bug with clear stack trace → `@hawk-debugger`
- Just needs codebase search → `@scout-explorer`

## Workflow
Delegate to `@trail-tracer`:

1. **OBSERVE** — restate the observation precisely, no interpretation
2. **FRAME** — define the exact "why" question
3. **HYPOTHESIZE** — generate 2+ competing explanations
4. **GATHER EVIDENCE** — for each, collect evidence FOR and AGAINST in parallel
5. **APPLY LENSES** — systems / premortem / science
6. **REBUT** — strongest alternative challenges the leader
7. **RANK** — down-rank contradicted, weak-assumption, failed-prediction explanations
8. **SYNTHESIZE** — best explanation, explicitly provisional if needed
9. **PROBE** — name the critical unknown and the discriminating next experiment

## Output
Saved to `workspace/development/debug/[C]trace-{topic}-{date}.md` using the `dev-trace-report.md` template.

## Pairs With
- `@trail-tracer` (the executor)
- `@hawk-debugger` (when trace converges to a clear bug)
- `@apex-architect` (when trace reveals architectural issues)

Versions

The database has no other skills named dev-trace.

Database snapshot: 13.11.2026 · package version 58d46ae09364 (SHA-256 digest of the entire package)

Downloads in the last 30 days: 0 · ranking

Report a problem with this skill: harmful content, incorrect descriptions or an author’s removal request.

Similar skills

  • 100trace
    Evidence-driven tracing with competing hypotheses in parallel. Activate when user says: trace this, trace, why did this happen, root cause analysis, investigate why.
  • 90project-analysis-hypothesis-driven
    Use when a bug has multiple plausible causes across layers — competing hypotheses, validation loops, evidence-based conclusions — even when the user just says 'why is this happening?'.
  • 100trace
    Evidence-driven tracing and execution tracking. Use for "trace this", "execution trace", and "track progress".
  • 100parallel-debugging
    Debug complex issues using competing hypotheses with parallel investigation, evidence collection, and root cause arbitration. Use this skill when debugging bugs with multiple potential causes, performing root cause analysis, or organizing parallel investigation workflows.
  • 100m-debug
    Root-cause a bug or failing test: reproduce, competing hypotheses, regression test. Use for debug一下/为什么报错/这个测试挂了.
  • 100debug-trace
    Use when a long or multi-session debugging effort needs its evidence, ruled-out theories, and next steps recorded under `.debug/traces`.

Feedback and reports

Your message goes to Bartosz Sokoliński. An email address is needed only for a reply. See the privacy policy.