Skip to content
Skills Library
Programming · Analysis

code-explore

/code-explore

Pure Claude code investigation. Use when: tracing execution paths, understanding architecture, diagnosing issues. Not for: dual-perspective review (use code-investigate), code review (use codex-code-review). Output: analysis report with findings.

Licence
MIT
Last repository change
08.10.2026

Assessment and security

100/ 100Class: good
Format25 / 25
Frontmatter with name and description, valid name, description up to 1,024 characters, name matching the folder.
Discoverability25 / 25
Description explains when to use the skill, has a reasonable length and uses third person.
Content35 / 35
At least 150 words and at most 500 lines, headings, step lists, examples or code.
Hygiene15 / 15
No placeholders such as TODO, no Windows paths, with a licence.
Riskno signals detected in the scan
Files in this package
2
Scripts
0
HTML comments
0
URLs in SKILL.md
0
Deprecation

No signals detected. Repository changed on 08.10.2026, without references to retired models or APIs.

Licence

MIT, open: use and modify while retaining author attribution.

What it does and when to use it

Pure Claude code investigation. Use when: tracing execution paths, understanding architecture, diagnosing issues. Not for: dual-perspective review (use code-investigate), code review (use codex-code-review). Output: analysis report with findings.

Original author description

Pure Claude code investigation. Use when: tracing execution paths, understanding architecture, diagnosing issues. Not for: dual-perspective review (use code-investigate), code review (use codex-code-review). Output: analysis report with findings.

How it works

  1. Trigger
  2. When to Use
  3. When NOT to Use
  4. Workflow
  5. Search Strategy
  6. Output Format
  7. Verification
  8. References
  9. Examples
  10. Difference from code-investigate
Original SKILL.md headings · 158 lines, 612 words
SKILL.md preview
---
name: code-explore
description: "Pure Claude code investigation. Use when: tracing execution paths, understanding architecture, diagnosing issues. Not for: dual-perspective review (use code-investigate), code review (use codex-code-review). Output: analysis report with findings."
allowed-tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash(ls:*), Bash(find:*)
context: fork
---

# Code Explore Skill

## Trigger

- Keywords: code explore, code investigation, research code, trace code, feature understanding, quick investigation, code exploration

## When to Use

- Quickly understand how a feature works
- Trace execution paths / data flow
- Diagnose problem root causes
- No dual confirmation needed (no Codex cross-validation)

## When NOT to Use

| Scenario                | Alternative                           |
| ----------------------- | ------------------------------------- |
| Need dual confirmation  | `/code-investigate` (Claude + Codex)  |
| Git history tracking    | `/git-investigate`                    |
| System verification     | `/feature-verify`                     |
| Code review             | `/codex-review-fast`                  |

## Workflow

```
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Phase 1: Locate Entry Point                                │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 1. Grep keywords -> find related files                     │
│ 2. Identify entry points (Controller / Service / Provider) │
│ 3. Build file list                                         │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
                          ↓
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Phase 2: Trace Path                                        │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 1. Start from entry point, Read                            │
│ 2. Identify dependencies -> continue tracing               │
│ 3. Map call chain (A -> B -> C)                            │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
                          ↓
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Phase 3: Understand Logic                                  │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 1. What is the core logic?                                 │
│ 2. How does data flow?                                     │
│ 3. Error handling mechanisms?                              │
│ 4. Key decision points?                                    │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
                          ↓
┌──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Phase 4: Output Report                                     │
├──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ 1. Architecture overview (diagram / table)                 │
│ 2. Key files list                                          │
│ 3. Execution flow                                          │
│ 4. Findings / notes                                        │
└──────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
```

## Search Strategy

| Target          | Strategy                                                 |
| --------------- | -------------------------------------------------------- |
| Feature entry   | `Grep "export class.*Controller"` / `Grep "@Get\|@Post"` |
| Service layer   | `Grep "export class.*Service"`                           |
| Provider layer  | `Glob "src/provider/**/*.ts"`                            |
| Configuration   | `Read {CONFIG_FILE}`                                     |
| Data models     | `Glob "src/model/**/*.ts"`                               |

## Output Format

```markdown
## Investigation Report: {Topic}

### Architecture Overview

{ASCII or Mermaid diagram}

### Key Files

| File              | Responsibility |
| ----------------- | -------------- |
| `path/to/file.ts` | Description   |

### Execution Flow

1. {Step 1}
2. {Step 2}
3. ...

### Data Flow

{Describe how data flows}

### Findings

- {Important finding 1}
- {Important finding 2}

### Notes

- {Potential issue / edge case}
```

## Verification

- [ ] Entry points identified and listed
- [ ] Execution flow traced end-to-end
- [ ] Key files table includes all relevant files
- [ ] Findings section has actionable insights

## References

- `references/search-patterns.md` — Common search patterns for codebase exploration (read when building search strategy)

## Examples

### Feature Understanding

```
Input: Investigate how user data queries work
Phase 1: Grep "balance" -> find UserService, UserController
Phase 2: Controller -> Service -> Provider call chain
Phase 3: Understand query + cache mechanism
Phase 4: Output report + flow diagram
```

### Problem Diagnosis

```
Input: Why does this API sometimes return empty?
Phase 1: Grep "getData" + "cache" -> related files
Phase 2: Trace data retrieval path
Phase 3: Identify fallback logic + timeout handling
Phase 4: List possible causes + recommendations
```

### Architecture Understanding

```
Input: What is the overall architecture of the user module?
Phase 1: Glob "src/**/*user*" -> list all related files
Phase 2: Identify layer relationships (Controller -> Service -> Provider)
Phase 3: Understand each layer's responsibilities
Phase 4: Output architecture diagram + module description
```

## Difference from code-investigate

| Dimension    | code-explore           | code-investigate       |
| ------------ | ---------------------- | ---------------------- |
| Speed        | Fast (single view)     | Slow (dual view)       |
| Confirmation | Single perspective     | Cross-validation       |
| Tools        | Pure Claude            | Claude + Codex         |
| Use case     | Quick investigation    | Important decisions    |
Files in this package (2)
  • SKILL.md 7 KB
  • references/search-patterns.md 2 KB

Versions

The database has no other skills named code-explore.

Database snapshot: 13.11.2026 · package version dcf125f9f819 (SHA-256 digest of the entire package)

Downloads in the last 30 days: 0 · ranking

Report a problem with this skill: harmful content, incorrect descriptions or an author’s removal request.

Similar skills

  • 100deep-explore
    Multi-wave parallel code exploration orchestrator. Use when: large-scale codebase research, understanding complex cross-domain systems, deep investigation needing multiple perspectives simultaneously. Not for: quick lookup (use code-explore), dual confirmation (use…
  • 100feature-dev
    Feature development workflow. Use when: implementing features, writing code, running dev loop. Not for: understanding code (use code-explore), reviewing code (use codex-code-review). Output: implemented feature + tests + review gate.
  • 100tracer
    Use when tracing execution paths, mapping dependencies, understanding unfamiliar code, following data flow, investigating end-to-end behavior, debugging call chains, or deciding which files to read next.
  • 100codex-review
    Run Codex code review with Claude's independent double-check. Use when asked \"codex review\", \"review my code with codex\", or wants Codex to review code changes. For adversarial review use /codex-adversarial.
  • 84review-code
    Review code changes for quality, security, and performance. Use when user says "review my changes", "do a code review", "check this for issues", "analyze code quality", "security review", "performance review", "is this PR ready", or needs architecture, security, performance, and style analysis.
  • 100review
    Reviews uncommitted changes, a commit, or a branch with another vendor's model or harness — Codex from Claude Code, Claude Code from Codex. Use when the user asks for a code review, or before opening a PR.

Feedback and reports

Your message goes to Bartosz Sokoliński. An email address is needed only for a reply. See the privacy policy.