security
/security
Pomaga przeglądać zmiany wrażliwe na bezpieczeństwo: API, uwierzytelnianie, autoryzację, dane, sekrety i zależności według OWASP.
- Repozytorium
- lucy-ai ↗
- Licencja
- MIT
- Ostatnia zmiana repozytorium
- 31.07.2026
Ocena i bezpieczeństwo
- Pliki w paczce
- 1
- Skrypty
- 0
- Komentarze HTML
- 0
- Adresy URL w SKILL.md
- 4
Brak sygnałów. Repozytorium zmienione 31.07.2026, bez odwołań do wycofanych modeli i API.
MIT, otwarta: można używać i zmieniać, z zachowaniem informacji o autorze.
Co robi i kiedy
Pomaga przeglądać zmiany wrażliwe na bezpieczeństwo: API, uwierzytelnianie, autoryzację, dane, sekrety i zależności według OWASP.
Oryginalny opis (EN)
Project-agnostic application security review guidance based on OWASP risks and secure engineering practices. Use when reviewing security-sensitive changes, APIs, authentication, authorization, data handling, secrets, dependencies, frontend security, infrastructure configuration, or PR security posture.
Jak działa
- When to Use
- Golden Rule
- Security Review Workflow
- Core Checklist
- Severity Guide
- Secure Review Comment Pattern
- Common Anti-Patterns
- Useful Commands
- References
Podgląd SKILL.md
--- name: security description: > Project-agnostic application security review guidance based on OWASP risks and secure engineering practices. Use when reviewing security-sensitive changes, APIs, authentication, authorization, data handling, secrets, dependencies, frontend security, infrastructure configuration, or PR security posture. license: Apache-2.0 metadata: author: lucy-camilo version: "1.1" --- # Application Security Review Skill ## When to Use Use this skill when: - Reviewing PRs for security risk - Designing or changing auth/authz, identity, permissions, sessions, tokens, or tenant boundaries - Handling sensitive data, files, payments, PII, credentials, or audit logs - Adding dependencies, CI/CD steps, infrastructure config, or public endpoints - Investigating vulnerabilities or hardening an app Always combine this with: - The repo's `docs/STANDARDS.md` - The applicable stack skill, such as `csharp-dotnet`, `angular-core`, or `typescript` - Project-specific threat model or compliance docs if present ## Golden Rule > Security is not an optional feature. If a change can expose data, escalate privileges, weaken auth, bypass validation, leak secrets, or break auditability, treat it as blocking until proven safe. ## Security Review Workflow 1. Identify assets: user data, tenant data, secrets, payments, files, admin actions, logs, tokens. 2. Identify trust boundaries: browser/server, public/private network, tenant/user/admin, third-party APIs, queues, background jobs. 3. Check the changed code against the checklist below. 4. Look for negative tests: unauthorized, forbidden, invalid input, expired token, wrong tenant/user, malformed file, replay, race. 5. Classify findings as blocking/suggestion/nit and cite exact files/lines. ## Core Checklist ### Access Control - [ ] Server enforces authorization; UI checks are only convenience. - [ ] Every protected endpoint/action has explicit permission/role/policy checks. - [ ] Object-level authorization prevents IDOR/BOLA: users can only access resources they own or are allowed to manage. - [ ] Tenant/account/project boundaries cannot be selected from untrusted URL/query/body values unless verified. - [ ] Admin and support flows require stronger checks and audit logs. - [ ] Default behavior is deny, not allow. **Flag immediately:** client-only permission checks, predictable IDs without ownership checks, wildcard admin access, missing policy on write/delete/export endpoints. ### Authentication and Session Security - [ ] Passwords are hashed with approved password hashing algorithms; never custom crypto. - [ ] JWT/session validation checks issuer, audience, signature, expiry, and revocation/session state where required. - [ ] Refresh tokens are rotated and stored safely. - [ ] Cookies use `HttpOnly`, `Secure`, and appropriate `SameSite`. - [ ] MFA/step-up auth is considered for high-risk actions. - [ ] Login, reset, invitation, and email-change flows avoid account enumeration. ### Input Validation and Injection - [ ] All untrusted input is validated at the server boundary. - [ ] SQL/NoSQL/LDAP queries use parameterization or safe ORM APIs. - [ ] Shell commands avoid user-controlled strings; if unavoidable, use argument arrays and allowlists. - [ ] HTML/Markdown rendering is sanitized. - [ ] File paths are normalized and restricted to expected directories. - [ ] Regexes avoid catastrophic backtracking on untrusted input. ### Cryptography and Secrets - [ ] No secrets, tokens, private keys, connection strings, or API keys are committed. - [ ] Secrets come from environment variables, secret managers, or managed identity. - [ ] TLS is required for sensitive traffic. - [ ] Encryption uses vetted libraries and safe modes; no custom algorithms. - [ ] Keys have rotation strategy and are not logged. - [ ] Sensitive data at rest is encrypted when required by risk/compliance. ### Security Misconfiguration - [ ] Production disables debug pages, verbose errors, test endpoints, and permissive logging. - [ ] CORS uses explicit origins, not `*` with credentials. - [ ] Security headers are configured where applicable: CSP, HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, Referrer-Policy, frame protections. - [ ] Cloud resources are private by default and least-privilege. - [ ] Health/status endpoints do not leak versions, env vars, dependency details, or secrets. ### Dependency and Supply Chain - [ ] Dependency changes are reviewed intentionally, including transitive risk. - [ ] Lockfiles are committed and reviewed. - [ ] CI runs vulnerability scanning appropriate to the stack. - [ ] Build scripts do not curl/bash unverified remote code. - [ ] Package sources/registries are trusted and pinned where possible. - [ ] GitHub Actions or CI workflows pin third-party actions by SHA for high-security repos. ### Data Protection and Privacy - [ ] Responses expose only required fields. - [ ] Logs/telemetry do not include secrets, tokens, passwords, PII, payment data, or sensitive payloads. - [ ] Data export/download endpoints enforce authorization, rate limits, and audit logging. - [ ] Deletion/anonymization follows product/compliance requirements. - [ ] Backups, caches, queues, and search indexes respect data retention and isolation rules. ### File Uploads and Downloads - [ ] File size, type, extension, MIME, and content are validated. - [ ] Uploaded files are scanned or sandboxed when risk justifies it. - [ ] Files are stored outside executable web roots or served through controlled download handlers. - [ ] Download paths cannot be traversed with `../` or encoded variants. - [ ] User-provided filenames are sanitized before storage/display. ### Frontend Security - [ ] No sensitive tokens or secrets are stored in localStorage/sessionStorage unless explicitly accepted by the threat model. - [ ] XSS risks are controlled: avoid unsafe HTML, sanitize rich text, do not bypass framework sanitizers. - [ ] CSP/Trusted Types are considered for high-risk apps. - [ ] Client-side feature flags or hidden controls are not treated as authorization. - [ ] Error messages do not reveal sensitive internals. ### APIs and Integrations - [ ] Public APIs have authentication, authorization, validation, rate limits, and auditability where needed. - [ ] Webhooks verify signatures and timestamps and are replay-resistant. - [ ] Outbound calls use allowlisted hosts when possible and avoid SSRF. - [ ] Third-party API failures are handled safely without leaking secrets or corrupting state. - [ ] Idempotency keys protect retryable write operations. ## Severity Guide | Severity | Examples | Action | |---|---|---| | 🔴 Blocking | Auth bypass, tenant/user data leak, injection, secrets committed, unsafe file handling, production debug exposure, missing required security tests | Request changes | | ⚠️ Important | Weak logging/auditing, missing rate limits, incomplete validation, dependency risk needing follow-up | Suggest fix or create tracked task | | 💬 Advisory | Defense-in-depth improvement, documentation gap, minor hardening | Non-blocking note | ## Secure Review Comment Pattern Use this format for findings: ```markdown 🔴 Blocking — [short title] File: `path/to/file.ext:line` What I found: [Specific behavior] Why it matters: [Security impact] Suggested fix: [Concrete change] Expected test: [Negative/positive test that proves it] ``` ## Common Anti-Patterns | Anti-pattern | Safer approach | |---|---| | Client-only auth checks | Server-side authorization policy/object ownership checks | | `AllowAnyOrigin()` with credentials | Explicit CORS origin allowlist | | Raw string SQL/commands | Parameterized queries / safe argument APIs | | Secrets in app config committed to repo | Secret manager/env vars/managed identity | | Logging full request/response bodies | Structured logs with redaction | | Trusting tenant/account IDs from request body | Resolve from authenticated context, then verify ownership | | Serving uploaded files directly | Controlled download endpoint with authorization and safe content headers | | Disabling TLS validation | Fix certificates/trust store | | Broad cloud IAM roles | Least-privilege scoped identities | ## Useful Commands Run only commands appropriate for the repo's stack: ```bash # .NET dotnet list package --vulnerable --include-transitive dotnet list package --outdated # Node/npm npm audit --audit-level=high npm outdated # Git secret scan examples, if tools are installed gitleaks detect --source . trufflehog filesystem . ``` ## References - [OWASP Top 10](https://owasp.org/www-project-top-ten/) - [OWASP API Security Top 10](https://owasp.org/www-project-api-security/) - [OWASP Cheat Sheet Series](https://cheatsheetseries.owasp.org/) - [Microsoft Security Development Lifecycle](https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/securityengineering/sdl)
Wersje
| Repozytorium | Wynik | Licencja |
|---|---|---|
| Ta strona · CamiloAndresGTRUniandes/lucy-ai | 100 | MIT |
| flavien-ia/hypervibe-craft | 100 | Apache-2.0 |
| boshu2/agentops | 100 | Apache-2.0 |
| asckye/tia_portal_openness_mcp | 100 | MIT |
| Esposter/Esposter | 100 | Apache-2.0 |
| event4u-app/agent-config | 100 | MIT |
| motormetrics/motormetrics | 100 | MIT |
| motormetrics/motormetrics | 100 | MIT |
| lamngockhuong/aiteamkit | 100 | MIT |
Migawka bazy z 28.10.2026 · wersja paczki 5ccf222e8132 (skrót SHA-256 całej paczki)
Zgłoś problem z tym skillem: szkodliwa treść, błędny opis albo prośba autora o usunięcie.
Podobne skille
- 100security-testing
Testuje bezpieczeństwo aplikacji webowych i API: OWASP Top 10, uwierzytelnianie i autoryzację, skanowanie zależności, sekrety oraz SAST i DAST. - 90security-reviewer-workflow
Przegląda uwierzytelnianie, uprawnienia, zależności, konfigurację, dane wrażliwe, logowanie, CORS, sekrety i ryzyka usług zewnętrznych jako recenzent bezpieczeństwa. - 95security-assistant
Prowadzi przegląd bezpieczeństwa i ocenę słabych punktów wg OWASP: uwierzytelnianie, autoryzację i modelowanie zagrożeń. - 100owasp-security
Sprawdza kod i zmiany pod kątem podatności, a także pomaga wdrażać uwierzytelnianie, sesje i kryptografię zgodnie z OWASP. - 90Web Security
Stosuje profesjonalne standardy bezpieczeństwa w aplikacjach webowych: uwierzytelnianie, autoryzacja, dane wejściowe, API, sesje, sekrety i płatności, z OWASP Top 10 2025 i przeglądem kodu. - 100security-review
Przegląda uwierzytelnianie, autoryzację i przepływy wrażliwe na bezpieczeństwo na podstawie dowodów z grafu Ontoly.