sales-proposal
/sales-proposal
Pisze ofertę sprzedażową, która przekonuje klienta do decyzji: streszczenie, uzasadnienie biznesowe, rekomendację i strukturę dokumentu.
- Autor
- qa-aman ↗
- Repozytorium
- claude-skills ↗
- Licencja
- MIT
- Ostatnia zmiana repozytorium
- 19.10.2026
Ocena i bezpieczeństwo
- Pliki w paczce
- 1
- Skrypty
- 0
- Komentarze HTML
- 0
- Adresy URL w SKILL.md
- 0
Brak sygnałów. Repozytorium zmienione 19.10.2026, bez odwołań do wycofanych modeli i API.
MIT, otwarta: można używać i zmieniać, z zachowaniem informacji o autorze.
Co robi i kiedy
Pisze ofertę sprzedażową, która przekonuje klienta do decyzji: streszczenie, uzasadnienie biznesowe, rekomendację i strukturę dokumentu.
Wyzwalacze z opisu
Oryginalny opis (EN)
Write a compelling sales proposal. Use when the user says "write a sales proposal", "put together a proposal", "draft a proposal for this prospect", "create a business case", "write up our recommendation", "how to structure a proposal", "proposal template", "executive summary for a deal", or wants to create a written document that moves a prospect toward a decision.
Jak działa
- Overview
- Workflow
- Anti-Patterns
- Quality Checklist
Podgląd SKILL.md
--- name: sales-proposal description: > Write a compelling sales proposal. Use when the user says "write a sales proposal", "put together a proposal", "draft a proposal for this prospect", "create a business case", "write up our recommendation", "how to structure a proposal", "proposal template", "executive summary for a deal", or wants to create a written document that moves a prospect toward a decision. --- ## Overview Based on **"The Challenger Sale"** by Matthew Dixon and Brent Adamson. Dixon and Adamson's CEB research across 6,000 sales reps found that top performers don't just respond to what prospects ask for - they teach prospects something new about their business, tailor the message to what the stakeholder cares about, and take control of the commercial conversation. A Challenger proposal doesn't start with your product. It starts with the prospect's world. ## Workflow ### Step 1: Open with a reframe, not an introduction The first section must teach the prospect something they don't already know about their own situation. This is the Challenger "teach" move. Structure: - Start with an industry or market insight the prospect hasn't considered - Connect that insight to a specific gap or risk in how they currently operate - Make it specific to their business, not generic to their industry Example opening angle: "Most [industry] teams focus on [obvious metric], but the data shows that [non-obvious insight] is actually the leading indicator of [outcome they care about]. Teams that optimize for [metric] instead are seeing [specific result]." Do not start with "Company X is pleased to present this proposal to [Prospect]." That is a brochure, not a proposal. ### Step 2: Quantify their current cost of inaction Before presenting any solution, show the prospect what staying the same costs them. Use numbers from your discovery call. Format: - Current state: [what they're doing today] - Friction: [what breaks or underperforms as a result] - Cost: [time, revenue, headcount, or risk - in specific numbers] Example: - Current state: Manual reporting across 4 tools, reconciled weekly - Friction: 6 hours per analyst per week, error rate of ~12% requiring rework - Cost: ~$180K/year in analyst time, plus downstream decisions made on stale data If the prospect supplied these numbers in discovery, quote them back verbatim. Their data is more credible than yours. ### Step 3: Present the recommendation - not the product Lead with the outcome the prospect gets, not the features you provide. For each major problem area: 1. **The problem**: restate in their words from discovery 2. **The approach**: how [your product] addresses it specifically 3. **The result**: what measurably changes, in their terms Avoid feature lists. Every sentence in the solution section should answer "so what?" If you can't answer "so what?", cut it. ### Step 4: Handle objections preemptively Include a short section that acknowledges the top 2-3 concerns a skeptical stakeholder would have. Format: **"You might be wondering..."** - "...whether this is a priority given [competing initiative]" + your answer - "...how long implementation actually takes" + your answer with specifics - "...what happens if [risk scenario]" + your answer This signals confidence and builds trust with the Economic Buyer who wasn't in your discovery call. ### Step 5: Make the business case explicit Include a simple ROI summary near the end, before pricing. | | Year 1 | Year 2 | |---|---|---| | Investment | $[X] | $[X] | | Estimated return | $[Y] | $[Y] | | Net benefit | $[Z] | $[Z] | | Payback period | [N months] | - | Use conservative estimates. Label assumptions clearly. A credible conservative number beats an optimistic number no one believes. ### Step 6: Close with a specific ask and next step The last section is a call to action with a specific decision request. Structure: - What you're asking them to decide - What happens next if they say yes (timeline, first steps) - Your proposed decision date - give them one, don't ask for one Example: "To move forward, we need a signed order form by [date] to hold your implementation slot in [month]. Once signed, [first action] begins within [timeframe]. I'll follow up on [date] to answer any final questions before then." ## Anti-Patterns **1. Starting with a company overview** Bad: "Founded in [year], [your company] is a leading provider of..." Good: Start with an insight about the prospect's world. They don't care about your founding date. **2. Sending a generic capabilities deck** Bad: Repurposing a standard deck with the prospect's logo on slide 1. Good: Every section references something specific from your discovery conversation. **3. Feature-first solution sections** Bad: "[Your product] includes automated reporting, real-time dashboards, and 200+ integrations." Good: "Your analysts spend 6 hours/week reconciling data across tools. [Your product] eliminates that with automated consolidation, returning ~300 hours/year to your team." **4. Soft close** Bad: "We hope you'll consider moving forward with us. Please let us know if you have questions." Good: Give them a specific decision date, a named next step, and your direct contact. ## Quality Checklist - [ ] Proposal opens with a reframe or insight, not a company introduction - [ ] Cost of inaction is quantified with specific numbers - [ ] Solution section is structured around problems, not features - [ ] Each solution claim answers "so what?" for the prospect - [ ] Top 2-3 objections are addressed preemptively - [ ] ROI summary is included with labeled assumptions - [ ] Final section contains a specific decision ask with a proposed date - [ ] Language from discovery call is used throughout - their words, not your words
Wersje
W bazie nie ma innych skilli o nazwie sales-proposal.
Migawka bazy z 28.10.2026 · wersja paczki f12d72fddec6 (skrót SHA-256 całej paczki)
Pobrania w ostatnich 30 dniach: 0 · ranking
Zgłoś problem z tym skillem: szkodliwa treść, błędny opis albo prośba autora o usunięcie.
Podobne skille
- 90sales-proposal-writer
Pisze oferty handlowe: zakres, rezultaty, cenę, warunki, założenia, kryteria decyzji i jasne kolejne kroki. - 100deal-proposal
Generuje pełną propozycję B2B z kontekstu transakcji: streszczenie dla zarządu, opis problemu, rozwiązanie, tabelę cen, harmonogram wdrożenia, uzasadnienie ROI i kolejne kroki. - 100proposal-pricing
Pomaga zbudować ofertę, ustrukturyzować cennik, przygotować SOW, wycenę i opcje cenowe dla klienta, a także przedstawić transakcję potencjalnemu nabywcy. - 100proposal-writer
Tworzy przekonujące propozycje biznesowe i partnerskie, oferty przetargowe i dokumenty pitchowe, gotowe do przekazania klientowi. - 84proposal-gen
Tworzy ofertę dla klienta z zakresem prac, harmonogramem i kalkulacją ROI dla wdrożenia automatyzacji. - 95memstack-business-proposal-writer
Pisze oferty projektowe dla klienta, od opisu problemu po zakres, harmonogram i wycenę.