incident-response
/incident-response
Analizuje incydenty przez Harness MCP: wiąże je z ostatnimi wdrożeniami, ocenia zasięg i wpływ na usługi zależne oraz generuje postmortem.
- Autor
- harness ↗
- Repozytorium
- harness-skills ↗
- Licencja
- Apache-2.0
- Ostatnia zmiana repozytorium
- 23.10.2026
Ocena i bezpieczeństwo
- Pliki w paczce
- 1
- Skrypty
- 0
- Komentarze HTML
- 0
- Adresy URL w SKILL.md
- 0
Brak sygnałów. Repozytorium zmienione 23.10.2026, bez odwołań do wycofanych modeli i API.
Apache-2.0, otwarta: można używać i zmieniać, z zachowaniem licencji i informacji o zmianach.
Co robi i kiedy
Analizuje incydenty przez Harness MCP: wiąże je z ostatnimi wdrożeniami, ocenia zasięg i wpływ na usługi zależne oraz generuje postmortem.
Oryginalny opis (EN)
Incident response and analysis via Harness MCP. Correlate incidents with recent deployments, assess blast radius and downstream service impact, and generate comprehensive postmortem documents. Use when asked to investigate an incident, determine if a deployment caused an issue, assess blast radius, or create a postmortem. Do NOT use for pipeline debugging (use debug-pipeline instead) or SLO management (use manage-slos instead). Trigger phrases: incident, deployment correlation, blast radius, postmortem, root cause, service impact, outage analysis, rollback decision, incident timeline, deployme
Jak działa
- Instructions
- Examples
- Performance Notes
- Troubleshooting
Podgląd SKILL.md
--- name: incident-response description: >- Incident response and analysis via Harness MCP. Correlate incidents with recent deployments, assess blast radius and downstream service impact, and generate comprehensive postmortem documents. Use when asked to investigate an incident, determine if a deployment caused an issue, assess blast radius, or create a postmortem. Do NOT use for pipeline debugging (use debug-pipeline instead) or SLO management (use manage-slos instead). Trigger phrases: incident, deployment correlation, blast radius, postmortem, root cause, service impact, outage analysis, rollback decision, incident timeline, deployment caused, which deploy. metadata: author: Harness version: 1.0.0 mcp-server: harness-mcp-v2 summary: Deployment-incident correlation, blast radius analysis, and postmortems license: Apache-2.0 compatibility: Requires Harness MCP v2 server (harness-mcp-v2) --- # Incident Response Correlate incidents with deployments, assess blast radius, and generate postmortem documents using Harness MCP. ## Instructions ### Step 1: Establish Scope Confirm the affected service, environment, and incident details. ``` Call MCP tool: harness_list Parameters: resource_type: "service" org_id: "<organization>" project_id: "<project>" ``` ### Step 2: Identify the Incident Response Task Determine which workflow the user needs: 1. **Deployment-to-Incident Correlation** -- Determine if a recent deployment caused the incident 2. **Blast Radius Assessment** -- Map affected services and downstream impact 3. **Postmortem Generation** -- Create a structured postmortem document ### Step 3: Correlate Deployment to Incident Gather from the user: - Affected service name and environment - Alert or incident name and start time - Observed symptoms (error rate spike, latency, outage) Pull recent deployments: ``` Call MCP tool: harness_list Parameters: resource_type: "execution" org_id: "<organization>" project_id: "<project>" status: "Success" ``` For each recent deployment, check: - **Timing:** Was the deployment within the incident correlation window (e.g., 2 hours before)? - **Service match:** Does the deployed service match or depend on the affected service? - **Change content:** What changed in the deployment (config, code, infrastructure)? Build a deployment timeline: 1. List all deployments to the affected environment in the last N hours 2. Mark the incident start time on the timeline 3. Identify the most likely causal deployment (closest before incident start) 4. Check if a rollback was performed and whether it resolved the issue Present findings with confidence level: HIGH (deployment matches timing + service), MEDIUM (timing matches but different service), LOW (no deployment correlation found). ### Step 4: Assess Blast Radius Gather from the user: - Failing service and failure type (outage, elevated error rate, high latency) - Current error rate or severity - Environment Map the impact: ``` Call MCP tool: harness_status Parameters: org_id: "<organization>" project_id: "<project>" ``` Assess: - **Direct impact:** The failing service's error rate, latency, and availability - **Upstream callers:** Services that call the failing service -- are they degrading? - **Downstream dependencies:** Services the failing service depends on -- are they healthy? - **User impact:** Estimate affected users based on traffic volume - **Data integrity:** Any risk of data corruption or inconsistency? Classify severity: - **Critical:** User-facing outage, data loss risk, or multiple services affected - **Major:** Degraded performance affecting users, single service impacted - **Minor:** Internal service degraded, no user-facing impact Recommend immediate actions based on blast radius: - If deployment-correlated: recommend rollback with expected resolution time - If infrastructure-related: recommend failover or scaling - If dependency-related: recommend circuit breaker activation or graceful degradation ### Step 5: Generate Postmortem Gather from the user: - Service name and incident summary - Incident duration and environment - Resolution steps taken Structure the postmortem: **1. Executive Summary** -- What happened, customer impact, duration (2-3 sentences) **2. Timeline** -- Build from Harness pipeline events and alert timestamps: - When was the issue first detected? - When did the on-call team engage? - What deployment or change triggered the regression? - When was mitigation applied and service restored? Pull timeline data: ``` Call MCP tool: harness_list Parameters: resource_type: "execution" org_id: "<organization>" project_id: "<project>" ``` **3. Root Cause Analysis** -- Which deployment or change triggered the incident and why **4. Impact Assessment** -- Affected services, environments, and approximate user impact **5. Action Items** -- Categorized as: - Immediate fixes (address the root cause) - Process improvements (prevent recurrence) - Monitoring improvements (detect faster) **6. Lessons Learned** -- What went well, what didn't, and what was lucky ## Examples - "Our payment service is down -- was it a deployment?" -- Correlate incident with recent deployments and provide confidence level - "What is the blast radius of the checkout outage?" -- Map upstream/downstream services and estimate user impact - "Generate a postmortem for yesterday's auth-service incident" -- Create structured postmortem with timeline, RCA, and action items - "A Sev-1 just fired -- which deployment caused it?" -- Pull recent deployments and correlate with alert timing ## Performance Notes - Deployment correlation is most accurate within a 2-hour window -- beyond that, other factors become more likely. - Blast radius assessment requires an up-to-date service dependency map -- stale maps miss connections. - Postmortems should be generated within 48 hours while the incident is fresh in the team's memory. - Always include what went well in the postmortem -- blameless culture requires acknowledging good responses. ## Troubleshooting ### No Deployment Found in Correlation Window - Expand the search window to 4-6 hours -- some failures have delayed onset - Check for infrastructure changes (not just code deployments) - Look for config changes, feature flag toggles, or certificate expirations ### Blast Radius Assessment Missing Services - The service dependency map may be incomplete -- check for undocumented dependencies - Look for shared infrastructure (databases, message queues) that multiple services use - Check for external dependencies (third-party APIs, DNS, CDN) ### Postmortem Missing Timeline Events - Pull from multiple sources: pipeline executions, alert history, and chat transcripts - Check if automated rollbacks occurred that may not be in the deployment history - Include infrastructure events (auto-scaling, node failures) alongside deployment events
Wersje
| Repozytorium | Wynik | Licencja |
|---|---|---|
| Ta strona · harness/harness-skills | 100 | Apache-2.0 |
| microsoft/hve-core | 100 | MIT |
| zts212653/clowder-ai | 100 | MIT |
| alirezarezvani/claude-skills | 100 | MIT |
| nimadorostkar/Claude-Skills-collection | 100 | MIT |
| rampstackco/claude-skills | 100 | MIT |
| qa-aman/claude-skills | 100 | MIT |
| omexit/claude-skills-pack | 100 | MIT |
| nahid-sparktales/agent-dispatcher | 100 | MIT |
Migawka bazy z 28.10.2026 · wersja paczki 0282f1f25b06 (skrót SHA-256 całej paczki)
Zgłoś problem z tym skillem: szkodliwa treść, błędny opis albo prośba autora o usunięcie.
Podobne skille
- 100incident
Prowadzi ustrukturyzowaną reakcję na incydent: ocena ważności, ograniczenie zasięgu, analiza przyczyny, dokumentacja osi czasu i postmortem, przy awarii lub błędzie produkcyjnym. - 100incident-postmortem-template
Prowadzi pracę z szablonem postmortemu incydentu w ramach dokumentacji technicznej. - 100postmortem-author
Tworzy postmortem bez szukania winnych dla rozwiązanego incydentu: oś czasu, przyczyny, wpływ na SLO i działania naprawcze, po zakończeniu triage lub większej awarii. - 100postmortem-author
Tworzy postmortem bez szukania winnych dla rozwiązanego incydentu: oś czasu, przyczyny, wpływ na SLO i działania naprawcze, po zakończeniu triage lub większej awarii. - 100incident-postmortem
Pomaga napisać bezwinny postmortem po awarii: rekonstrukcja osi czasu, analiza czynników, ocena skutków i zadania z właścicielami. - 100vercel-incident-runbook
Prowadzi reakcję na incydenty Vercel: triage, natychmiastowy rollback i postmortem po awariach i błędach produkcyjnych.