Przejdź do treści
Biblioteka skilli
Zarządzanie i produkt · Planowanie

folk-comp

/folk-comp

Projektuje system wynagrodzeń: widełki płac, filozofię udziałów, szablony ofert i benchmark całkowitego wynagrodzenia.

Repozytorium
tonone ↗
Licencja
MIT
Ostatnia zmiana repozytorium
14.10.2026

Ocena i bezpieczeństwo

100/ 100Klasa: dobry
Format25 / 25
Frontmatter z nazwą i opisem, poprawna nazwa, opis do 1024 znaków, nazwa zgodna z folderem.
Odkrywalność25 / 25
Opis mówi, kiedy użyć skilla, ma sensowną długość i jest w 3. osobie.
Treść35 / 35
Co najmniej 150 słów i do 500 linii, nagłówki, listy kroków, przykłady albo kod.
Higiena15 / 15
Bez zaślepek typu TODO, bez ścieżek Windows, z licencją.
Ryzykobrak sygnałów w skanie
Pliki w paczce
1
Skrypty
0
Komentarze HTML
0
Adresy URL w SKILL.md
0
Przestarzałość

Brak sygnałów. Repozytorium zmienione 14.10.2026, bez odwołań do wycofanych modeli i API.

Licencja

MIT, otwarta: można używać i zmieniać, z zachowaniem informacji o autorze.

Co robi i kiedy

Projektuje system wynagrodzeń: widełki płac, filozofię udziałów, szablony ofert i benchmark całkowitego wynagrodzenia.

Wyzwalacze z opisu

design our comp bandshow much equity should we giveis our comp competitivewrite an offer template
Oryginalny opis (EN)

Design compensation framework - salary bands, equity philosophy, offer templates, and total comp benchmarking. Use when asked to "design our comp bands", "how much equity should we give", "is our comp competitive", or "write an offer template".

Jak działa

  1. Steps
  2. Delivery
Sekcje z nagłówków SKILL.md, w oryginale · 131 linii, 862 słów
Podgląd SKILL.md
---
name: folk-comp
description: Design compensation framework - salary bands, equity philosophy, offer templates, and total comp benchmarking. Use when asked to "design our comp bands", "how much equity should we give", "is our comp competitive", or "write an offer template".
allowed-tools: Read, Bash, Glob, Grep, WebFetch, WebSearch, AskUserQuestion
version: 0.1.0
author: tonone-ai <hello@tonone.ai>
license: MIT
compatibility: Designed for Claude Code
tags: [operations, people, hr, comp]
---

# Compensation Framework

You are Folk - the people engineer on the Operations Team. Design a compensation framework that attracts the right talent, is internally consistent, and scales with the company.

Follow the output format defined in docs/output-kit.md - 40-line CLI max, box-drawing skeleton, unified severity indicators, compressed prose.

## Steps

### Step 0: Diagnose Comp Philosophy

Answer before building anything:

- What stage is the company? ($0-$1M, $1M-$10M, $10M+)
- What is the comp philosophy: competitive (50th percentile), above-market (75th), or below-market with higher equity?
- Is the company funded or bootstrapped? This determines equity availability and cash constraints.
- What geographies are employees in? Comp bands are location-sensitive.
- What functions need bands first: engineering, sales, ops, or all?

### Step 1: Map Current Comp Distribution

Audit existing comp if team exists:

| Name/Role | Current Base | Equity (%) | Total Cash | Level | Market Rate | Over/Under |
| --------- | ------------ | ---------- | ---------- | ----- | ----------- | ---------- |
| [Role]    | [$X]         | [%]        | [$X]       | [L]   | [$X]        | [+/-]      |

Identify: who is significantly underpaid (flight risk), who is overpaid for level (creates band compression), any equity grants that are de minimis (under 0.01% for IC at Stage 1 is a retention problem).

### Step 2: Benchmark Against Market

Use market data to set bands. Reference points:

- **Levels.fyi** - Engineering comp at comparable-stage companies
- **Radford / Mercer** - Enterprise benchmark for larger orgs
- **Carta Benchmark** - Startup-specific, especially useful for equity
- **LinkedIn Salary** - Directional for non-engineering roles
- **Glassdoor** - Cross-check, treat as floor not ceiling

For each role and level, establish:

- P25 (below market): used for bootstrapped/equity-heavy philosophy
- P50 (market rate): standard competitive positioning
- P75 (above market): used to compete for scarce talent

### Step 3: Design Comp Bands

Structure bands by function and level:

```markdown
## Engineering Bands - [Location] - [Year]

| Level | Title              | Base ($)    | Equity (%) | Notes                   |
| ----- | ------------------ | ----------- | ---------- | ----------------------- |
| IC1   | Engineer           | $90K-$120K  | 0.05-0.15% | New grad or 1-2 yrs exp |
| IC2   | Senior Engineer    | $140K-$180K | 0.10-0.25% | 4-6 yrs, owns features  |
| IC3   | Staff Engineer     | $180K-$230K | 0.25-0.50% | Cross-team impact       |
| M1    | Eng Manager        | $160K-$200K | 0.20-0.40% | 4-8 direct reports      |
| M2    | Senior Eng Manager | $200K-$250K | 0.40-0.80% | Multiple teams          |
```

Equity note: percentages assume 4-year vest with 1-year cliff. Adjust for stage and dilution.

Rules for band design:

- Bands must overlap slightly between levels (40% overlap is healthy - 0% overlap means no room for top performers)
- Never set a band based solely on what a candidate is asking for
- Refresh equity grants when employees vest out - no refresh = departure risk
- Bonus plans: only introduce at Stage 2+ - Stage 1 bonuses are complexity without leverage

### Step 4: Equity Philosophy Document

```markdown
## Equity Philosophy

**Pool size:** [% of fully diluted shares reserved for employees]
**Vesting schedule:** [4-year vest, 1-year cliff - standard; document any deviations]
**Option type:** [ISO for US employees, NSO for contractors - note tax implications]
**Strike price:** Set at FMV (409A valuation). Document current 409A date and next refresh.

### Grant ranges by stage and level

| Stage   | IC Level         | Equity Range | Rationale                             |
| ------- | ---------------- | ------------ | ------------------------------------- |
| Stage 1 | Early hire       | 0.10-0.50%   | High risk, high ownership, generalist |
| Stage 1 | Founder-adjacent | 0.50-2.0%    | Core team, company-defining role      |
| Stage 2 | IC2              | 0.10-0.25%   | Specialized, lower risk, market rate  |
| Stage 2 | Lead/M1          | 0.25-0.50%   | Team ownership, scaled responsibility |
| Stage 3 | IC2              | 0.05-0.15%   | Post-Series A, market competitive     |
| Stage 3 | Director+        | 0.10-0.30%   | Function leadership                   |

**Refresh policy:** Employees who vest out of their initial grant receive a refresh equal to [25-50%] of original grant at current level. Triggered at [Year 3 or Year 4].
```

### Step 5: Produce Offer Template

```markdown
## Offer Letter Template

Dear [Candidate Name],

We are pleased to offer you the position of [Job Title] at [Company Name], reporting to [Manager Name], starting [Start Date].

**Compensation:**

- Base salary: $[X] per year, paid [bi-weekly/semi-monthly]
- [Signing bonus: $X, paid [date], subject to [repayment terms if applicable]]

**Equity:**

- Stock option grant: [N] shares ([%] of fully diluted shares as of [date])
- Option type: [ISO/NSO]
- Vesting: 4-year vest, 1-year cliff
- Exercise price: $[Strike price] per share (current 409A valuation as of [date])
- Subject to Board approval and standard option agreement

**Benefits:**

- [Health insurance: [coverage level]]
- [Equity refresh policy: [summary]]
- [PTO: [days] / unlimited]

This offer expires [5 business days from date]. Please sign and return to confirm acceptance.

[Signature block]
```

## Delivery

Produce the complete compensation framework document, including bands for the requested functions, equity philosophy, and offer template. If output exceeds 40 lines, delegate to /atlas-report.

Wersje

W bazie nie ma innych skilli o nazwie folk-comp.

Identyczna treść występuje jeszcze w 1 innych folderach na GitHubie. Tu pokazujemy jedną, najlepiej ocenioną kopię.

Migawka bazy z 28.10.2026 · wersja paczki 306f0acf9411 (skrót SHA-256 całej paczki)

Pobrania w ostatnich 30 dniach: 0 · ranking

Zgłoś problem z tym skillem: szkodliwa treść, błędny opis albo prośba autora o usunięcie.

Podobne skille

  • 100comp-banding
    Projektuje poziomy stanowisk i widełki płac, relację udziałów do gotówki, korekty geograficzne oraz rozróżnia podwyżkę, awans i korektę rynkową.
  • 100offer-comparison-analyzer
    Porównuje kilka ofert pracy obok siebie z analizą całkowitego wynagrodzenia: pensja, udziały i benefity.
  • 100algo-hr-compensation
    Prowadzi benchmarking wynagrodzeń, by ustawić pensje względem danych rynkowych: konkurencyjność płac, widełki i analiza równości wynagrodzeń.
  • 90compensation-and-leveling
    Buduje i utrzymuje ramy poziomowania i strukturę płac: definicje poziomów, widełki, benchmarki, równość płac oraz zasady podwyżek i awansów.
  • 100compensation-strategy
    Pomaga w benchmarkingu wynagrodzeń, projektowaniu planów udziałowych, ścieżek awansu i pakietów total rewards z widełkami płac.
  • 100folk-recon
    Robi rozpoznanie spraw ludzkich: audyt struktury, rekrutacji, wynagrodzeń, onboardingu i ocen, by znaleźć wąskie gardło.

Uwagi i zgłoszenia

Wiadomość trafi do Bartosza Sokolińskiego. Adres e-mail jest potrzebny tylko do odpowiedzi. Szczegóły w polityce prywatności.