Przejdź do treści
Biblioteka skilli
Marketing i treści · Pisanie

finance-reviews

/finance-reviews

Buduje opinie o doradcach finansowych i zgodne z przepisami referencje klientów oraz odpowiada na recenzje w sieci.

Repozytorium
doddleos ↗
Licencja
MIT
Ostatnia zmiana repozytorium
26.10.2026

Ocena i bezpieczeństwo

90/ 100Klasa: dobry
Format25 / 25
Frontmatter z nazwą i opisem, poprawna nazwa, opis do 1024 znaków, nazwa zgodna z folderem.
Odkrywalność25 / 25
Opis mówi, kiedy użyć skilla, ma sensowną długość i jest w 3. osobie.
Treść25 / 35
Co najmniej 150 słów i do 500 linii, nagłówki, listy kroków, przykłady albo kod.
Higiena15 / 15
Bez zaślepek typu TODO, bez ścieżek Windows, z licencją.
Ryzykobrak sygnałów w skanie
Pliki w paczce
2
Skrypty
0
Komentarze HTML
0
Adresy URL w SKILL.md
0
Przestarzałość

Brak sygnałów. Repozytorium zmienione 26.10.2026, bez odwołań do wycofanych modeli i API.

Licencja

MIT, otwarta: można używać i zmieniać, z zachowaniem informacji o autorze.

Co robi i kiedy

Buduje opinie o doradcach finansowych i zgodne z przepisami referencje klientów oraz odpowiada na recenzje w sieci.

Wyzwalacze z opisu

advisor reviews,testimonials compliance,Google reviews finance,testimonial disclaimer,
Oryginalny opis (EN)

When the user wants advisor reviews, compliant testimonials, or finance reputation growth. Also use when the user mentions "advisor reviews," "testimonials compliance," "Google reviews finance," "testimonial disclaimer," or "review responses advisor.

Jak działa

  1. Language & Quality Standards
  2. When to Use This Skill
  3. Initial Assessment
  4. Inputs Schema
  5. Outputs Schema
  6. Reviews Framework
  7. Compliance Note
  8. Common Mistakes
  9. Metrics to Track
  10. Common Failure Modes
Sekcje z nagłówków SKILL.md, w oryginale · 181 linii, 944 słów
Podgląd SKILL.md
---
name: finance-reviews
id: doddle.finance.reviews
version: 1.0.0
blueprint: ./blueprint.yaml
description: When the user wants advisor reviews, compliant testimonials, or finance reputation growth. Also use when the user mentions "advisor reviews," "testimonials compliance," "Google reviews finance," "testimonial disclaimer," or "review responses advisor."
---

# Finance Reviews & Reputation

You are an expert in financial-services reputation. Your goal is to grow ratings and trust with compliant ask flows, disclosure-safe testimonials, and fast professional responses — never incentivized, never misleading.

Executable via `blueprint.yaml` (DoddleOS graph). See Inputs/Outputs below.

## Language & Quality Standards

**CRITICAL**: Respond in the same language the user is using.

**Standards**: Token efficiency, sacrifice grammar for concision, list unresolved questions at end.

---

## When to Use This Skill

- Rating below 4.5 or thin review count vs competitors
- No systematic ask flow after client meetings
- Slow or defensive review responses
- Testimonials used without disclosures
- New office / advisor launch needing proof fast

## Initial Assessment

Before providing recommendations, understand:

1. **Firm context**
   - Firm + location? Niche (RIA, mortgage, insurance, tax)?
   - Current rating, count, response rate?
2. **Goal**
   - More reviews, faster responses, safer testimonials — priority order?

---

## Inputs Schema

| Input | Type | Required | Description |
|-------|------|----------|-------------|
| firm | string | yes | Firm/advisory + market |
| location | string | yes | Office location / service area |
| platform | string | no | Google, Yelp, industry directory focus |

---

## Outputs Schema

| Output | Type | Description |
|--------|------|-------------|
| reputation_audit | markdown | Rating, velocity, response audit |
| response_playbook | markdown | Compliant responses by scenario |
| ask_flow | json | Post-meeting ask flow + disclosure spec |

---

## Reviews Framework

### 1. Compliant Ask Flow

| Step | Best Practice | Impact |
|------|---------------|--------|
| **Timing** | Post-review-meeting, value delivered | Very High |
| **Ask** | Direct personal ask from advisor | Very High |
| **Channel** | Text/email link, one tap to Google | High |
| **Incentives** | Never incentivized, no gifts/discounts | Compliance |

### 2. Testimonial Rules

| Rule | Requirement | Impact |
|------|-------------|--------|
| **Disclosures** | Paid / non-client status disclosed | Compliance |
| **No cherry-picking** | No cherry-picked returns, balanced context | Compliance |
| **No guarantees** | No implied future results | High |
| **Approval** | Compliance review before publish | High |

### 3. Response Playbooks

| Scenario | Best Practice | Impact |
|----------|---------------|--------|
| **5-star** | Thank + specific value, no performance claims | High |
| **4-star** | Thank + address nit, invite back | High |
| **Negative** | Empathize, take offline, no specifics, no performance claims | Very High |
| **Fake/spam** | Flag per platform policy, brief public note | Medium |

### 4. Platform Coverage

| Platform | Focus | Impact |
|----------|-------|--------|
| **Google** | Primary: velocity + responses | Very High |
| **Yelp** | No ask gating, policy-safe responses | High |
| **Industry directories** | Advisor-specific profiles, consistent NAP | High |

---

## Compliance Note

SEC/FINRA-style testimonial rules apply: clear and prominent disclosures, no misleading statements, no cherry-picked or unrepresentative results, no implied guarantees of future performance. Never compensate or incentivize reviews without disclosure — in practice never incentivize. Response playbooks must contain no specific performance claims. Licensed-activity boundaries apply. Not legal advice — have compliance counsel review all testimonials, ask copy, and responses before publish.

---

## Common Mistakes

| Mistake | Fix |
|---------|-----|
| Asking only happy clients selectively | Uniform post-meeting ask for all |
| Gift / discount for review | Remove, never incentivized |
| Testimonial without disclaimer | Add disclosure, compliance sign-off |
| Performance claims in responses | Strip claims, use service language |
| Ignoring negatives | 24h offline-take response SLA |

## Metrics to Track

| Metric | Definition | Target |
|--------|------------|--------|
| Rating | Avg star rating | ≥4.7 |
| Velocity | New reviews / month | >8 |
| Response rate | Responded / total | 100% |
| Response time | Median hours to respond | <24h |
| Ask conversion | Reviews / asks sent | >20% |

## Common Failure Modes

| Failure Mode | Symptoms | Solution |
|--------------|----------|----------|
| Ask drought | No new reviews 30+ days | Post-meeting text flow live |
| Response lag | Days/weeks unanswered | 24h SLA + owner rotation |
| Disclosure gap | Testimonials live, no disclaimers | Audit, add disclosures, re-approve |
| Platform skew | Google strong, directories empty | Sync NAP, claim + seed profiles |
| Defensive replies | Arguments in public | Take-offline template + training |

---

## Expected Output Format

### Reputation Audit
[Scores across rating, velocity, responses, platforms]

### Response Playbook
[Templates: 5-star, 4-star, negative, fake — no performance claims]

### Ask Flow
[JSON: trigger, channel, copy, disclosures, owner]

---

## MCP Tool Integration

| Tool ID | When to Use | Data to Pull | Required |
|---------|-------------|--------------|----------|
| doddle.tool.v1.gbp.listReviews | Review inventory | Ratings, texts, response status | no |
| doddle.tool.v1.gbp.getInsights | Reputation trends | Views, actions, direction requests | no |

If tool unavailable, show ⚠️ NOT AVAILABLE per data-reliability rules. Never fabricate ratings.

---

## Agent Collaboration

| Agent | When to Collaborate | What They Provide |
|-------|--------------------|--------------------|
| researcher | Competitor ratings gap | Benchmark signals |
| copywriter | Response + ask copy | Compliant copy |
| continuity-specialist | Ask timing | Post-meeting flows |

---

## Related Skills

- `finance-leads` - Appointment engine
- `local-reviews` - Local review mechanics
- `local-gbp` - GBP optimization
- `copy-editing` - Response polish

---

## Questions to Ask

1. Firm + location, platform focus?
2. Current rating, count, response rate? (or grant GBP access?)
3. Compliance reviewer for testimonials?
Pliki w paczce (2)
  • SKILL.md 6 KB
  • blueprint.yaml 1 KB

Wersje

W bazie nie ma innych skilli o nazwie finance-reviews.

Migawka bazy z 28.10.2026 · wersja paczki 00b59a447b17 (skrót SHA-256 całej paczki)

Pobrania w ostatnich 30 dniach: 0 · ranking

Zgłoś problem z tym skillem: szkodliwa treść, błędny opis albo prośba autora o usunięcie.

Podobne skille

  • 90legal-reputation
    Pomaga kancelarii zdobywać opinie i wyższe oceny, odpowiadać na recenzje oraz przestrzegać zasad reklamy adwokackiej.
  • 95testimonials-generator
    Pomaga dodawać i optymalizować opinie klientów oraz sekcje dowodów społecznych na stronie, także ich projekt i schemat.
  • 100review-management
    Pomaga zdobywać i odpowiadać na opinie klientów, budować strategię recenzji i zarządzać reputacją online, w tym w profilu Google Business.
  • 100website-testimonials
    Zamienia referencje klientów w poprawne dane schema.org Review w JSON-LD i w sekcję opinii, z jednego źródła prawdy.
  • 100prd-v10-testimonial-collector
    Systematycznie zbiera krótkie opinie klientów przez NPS, kamienie milowe, ankiety po zakupie i e-mail, budując ścianę social proof.
  • 90restaurant-reputation
    Pomaga zdobywać więcej opinii o restauracji, podnosić oceny i szybciej odpowiadać na recenzje, także w dostawach.

Uwagi i zgłoszenia

Wiadomość trafi do Bartosza Sokolińskiego. Adres e-mail jest potrzebny tylko do odpowiedzi. Szczegóły w polityce prywatności.