deliver-prd
/deliver-prd
Zarządza zespołem agentów wdrażających zadania z PRD: planuje fale zależności i prowadzi PR do scalenia na wskazanej gałęzi docelowej.
- Autor
- OpenSaasAU ↗
- Repozytorium
- stack ↗
- Licencja
- MIT
- Ostatnia zmiana repozytorium
- 26.10.2026
Ocena i bezpieczeństwo
- Pliki w paczce
- 3
- Skrypty
- 0
- Komentarze HTML
- 0
- Adresy URL w SKILL.md
- 0
Brak sygnałów. Repozytorium zmienione 26.10.2026, bez odwołań do wycofanych modeli i API.
MIT, otwarta: można używać i zmieniać, z zachowaniem informacji o autorze.
Co robi i kiedy
Zarządza zespołem agentów wdrażających zadania z PRD: planuje fale zależności i prowadzi PR do scalenia na wskazanej gałęzi docelowej.
Wyzwalacze z opisu
Oryginalny opis (EN)
Orchestrate a team of agents to implement a PRD's issues end-to-end — plan dependency waves, dispatch implementer/reviewer/QA agents, and shepherd each issue through PR, review, CI, and merge onto a target branch. Use when the user wants to act as engineering manager, implement a PRD or a set of issues with a team, run a parallel/dependency-ordered build, "lead the team" to deliver issues, or get issues merged onto a branch (never main).
Jak działa
- Prime directives
- 1. Set the ground rules (once, up front)
- 2. Plan the dependency waves
- 3. Per-issue lifecycle
- 4. Triaging review comments and CI
- 5. Scope discipline
- 6. Resilience
- 7. Finish
Podgląd SKILL.md
--- name: deliver-prd description: Orchestrate a team of agents to implement a PRD's issues end-to-end — plan dependency waves, dispatch implementer/reviewer/QA agents, and shepherd each issue through PR, review, CI, and merge onto a target branch. Use when the user wants to act as engineering manager, implement a PRD or a set of issues with a team, run a parallel/dependency-ordered build, "lead the team" to deliver issues, or get issues merged onto a branch (never main). --- # Deliver a PRD with a Team You are the **engineering manager**. You do **not** write code. You plan the work, dispatch agents to implement and review it, and drive every issue to a merged PR with the issue closed — then a QA pass and the PRD closed. This skill assumes the issues already exist. If they don't: - No PRD yet → `/to-spec`. - PRD but no issues → `/to-tickets`. It picks up from a PRD issue (or an explicit list of issues) and gets them merged. It does **not** replicate `/to-spec`, `/to-tickets`, `/review`, or `/qa-prd` — it conducts them. ## Prime directives - **You never code.** Implementation, fixes, reviews, and QA all happen in delegated agents. Your tools are planning, dispatching agents, GitHub, and judgement. - **Target branch only.** Every branch is cut from the agreed integration branch and every PR targets it. **Never** branch from, push to, or target the default/release branch (commonly `main`) unless the user explicitly says so. - **Separation of duties.** The agent that implements an issue never reviews it. Reviewers get the PR and nothing else. - **Nothing is lost.** Out-of-scope findings become follow-up issues; partial work from interrupted agents is recovered, not abandoned. ## 1. Set the ground rules (once, up front) Confirm with the user before dispatching anything — these shape every later step. Prefer `AskUserQuestion`. Capture: - **Integration branch** — the branch to cut from and target (e.g. `dev`). Confirm it exists. Reassert: never `main`. - **Merge authority** — who merges an approved + green PR: you (the EM), an automerge bot, or the user by hand. Then _watch what actually happens_ — if PRs start merging without your action, an automerge/human is the merge actor; react to the merge webhook and just close the issue. - **Review policy** — default: a fresh reviewer agent per PR, given only the PR, running `/review` and **posting the review onto the PR** (not just reporting back to you). - **Parallelism** — how many issues to run at once within a wave. - **Final QA** — whether to run a QA acceptance pass (`/qa-prd`) before closing the PRD (default: yes). Read the repo's `AGENTS.md` / contributing rules so your implementer briefs carry the house conventions. ## 2. Plan the dependency waves Read every issue (and the PRD). Build a wave plan from each issue's **Blocked by**: - **A wave is the set of issues whose blockers are all merged.** Unblocked issues run in parallel, up to the agreed parallelism. - A dependent issue starts only once its blockers are **merged into the integration branch** — so its branch, cut fresh from that branch, inherits the prerequisite code. Never start a dependent off an un-merged branch. - Keep a live status table (issue → PR → state) and refresh it as events arrive. Present the wave plan and confirm before kicking off. ## 3. Per-issue lifecycle For each issue in the active wave: 1. **Implement** — dispatch a _background_ general-purpose agent (`subagent_type: "general-purpose"`) in an _isolated worktree_, with [IMPLEMENTER.md](IMPLEMENTER.md) as its prompt (the brief is the prompt, not an agent type). It cuts a branch off the integration branch, implements to the acceptance criteria, runs the repo's checks, opens a PR targeting the integration branch, and **does not merge**. It reports the PR number. 2. **Review** — dispatch a _background_ general-purpose agent (`subagent_type: "general-purpose"`) with [REVIEWER.md](REVIEWER.md) as its prompt: only the PR number, runs the `/review` skill, posts the review to the PR, returns a verdict. 3. **Watch** — subscribe to the PR's activity (CI, comments, reviews) so events wake you. Don't poll with `sleep`. 4. **Triage events** — see §4. 5. **Merge & close** — when the PR is approved and CI is green, merge it to the integration branch (or let the configured merge actor do it). Then **close the issue**: merges into a non-default branch don't auto-close linked issues, so close it yourself (state_reason: completed). 6. **Advance** — recompute the wave; launch any newly-unblocked issues. Dispatch independent implementers in the same wave together so they run concurrently. ## 4. Triaging review comments and CI For every PR event, investigate first, then choose: - **Non-blocking review note** → don't block the merge; if it's worth doing, capture it as a follow-up issue (§5). - **Blocking but small and clear** → delegate a fix to an implementer **on the same PR branch** (update the branch, don't open a new PR); reply on the PR. Never code it yourself. - **Ambiguous or architectural** → `AskUserQuestion` before acting; include enough context to answer without scrolling back. - **Infrastructure / environmental noise** → recognise signals not caused by the PR (e.g. a schema-diff bot comparing the PR against the _release_ branch and reporting pre-existing drift the PR never introduced). State the rationale and skip — but say why, don't go silent. - **Real human review comment** → authoritative. Small/clear: delegate the fix and reply. Ambiguous: ask the user. When the task is "get CI green / babysit the PR," a CI failure is never a no-op: re-diagnose and re-kick until green, or until you hit a real out-of-scope blocker — then report where you're stuck. Refresh the status table on every event. ## 5. Scope discipline Implementer briefs are scoped to the issue's acceptance criteria. When review surfaces extra cleanups (a third duplicate, a missing toast, a typo in adjacent code): - Trivial, in-scope, and serving the issue's stated goal → fold into the fix. - Otherwise → **file a follow-up issue** (ready-for-agent), reference the parent, and let the PR merge. Don't grow the PR. These follow-ups can themselves become a later wave. ## 6. Resilience - **Usage/session limits** — instruct agents to flag them explicitly. On a limit, pause that lane; don't burn retries. Before re-dispatching, check whether partial work already landed (PR state, commits) so you neither duplicate nor clobber it. If a lane stalls on a limit, fold its remaining work into a tracked follow-up rather than blocking the whole train. - **Idempotency** — merges and closes are idempotent; a PR may already be merged by an external actor when you look. React to the merge webhook, then close the issue. - **Network** — pushes/fetches retry with exponential backoff (2s/4s/8s/16s), only on network errors. ## 7. Finish When every issue is merged and closed: - Run the QA acceptance pass — `/qa-prd` (or dispatch a QA agent) — verifying the delivered code on the integration branch against the PRD's acceptance criteria, required tests, and out-of-scope guarantees, and posting a sign-off on the PRD. - **PASS** → close the PRD (state_reason: completed). - **FAIL** → hold the close, report the defects, and open fix issues / re-enter the lifecycle. Then surface any residual threads the user owns — most commonly: the integration branch is now ahead of the release branch and needs a `dev → main` release PR (open it only if the user asks).
Pliki w paczce (3)
- IMPLEMENTER.md 3 KB
- REVIEWER.md 3 KB
- SKILL.md 7 KB
Wersje
| Repozytorium | Wynik | Licencja |
|---|---|---|
| Ta strona · OpenSaasAU/stack | 90 | MIT |
| OpenSaasAU/stack | 90 | MIT |
Migawka bazy z 28.10.2026 · wersja paczki 16f70a719130 (skrót SHA-256 całej paczki)
Zgłoś problem z tym skillem: szkodliwa treść, błędny opis albo prośba autora o usunięcie.
Podobne skille
- 100to-issues
Zamienia plan, specyfikację lub PRD w backlog cienkich zgłoszeń z zależnościami, z których każde dostarcza weryfikowalny pionowy plasterek. - 100orchestrate-deliver
Domyka dla każdej historyjki pliki story, następnie PRD i PLAN, czeka na zatwierdzenie przez człowieka i przygotowuje przekazanie, bez kodu aplikacji (etap O2 Orchestrated Delivery). - 100nw-deliver
Prowadzi całą falę DELIVER od początku do końca (roadmapa, wykonanie wszystkich kroków, finalizacja), gdy poprzednie fale są ukończone i funkcja jest gotowa do implementacji. - 100prd-review
Ocenia PRD pod kątem luk, uruchamiając równolegle agentów: PM, tech lead, DX i kosztów, z punktacją według 13 wymiarów. - 86prd-reviewer
Ocenia jakość dokumentu PRD przed implementacją i wskazuje braki w wymaganiach. - 95complete-milestone
Prowadzi kamień milowy od początku do końca: osobny agent na zadanie, fale zależności i scalanie na wspólnej gałęzi kamienia milowego.