Przejdź do treści
Biblioteka skilli
Produktywność osobista · Planowanie

continue

/continue

Wznawia przerwaną pracę z ustrukturyzowanym punktem kontrolnym: co zrobione, co dalej i jak sprawdzić ukończenie.

Licencja
MIT
Ostatnia zmiana repozytorium
28.09.2026

Ocena i bezpieczeństwo

86/ 100Klasa: dobry
Format25 / 25
Frontmatter z nazwą i opisem, poprawna nazwa, opis do 1024 znaków, nazwa zgodna z folderem.
Odkrywalność25 / 25
Opis mówi, kiedy użyć skilla, ma sensowną długość i jest w 3. osobie.
Treść21 / 35
Co najmniej 150 słów i do 500 linii, nagłówki, listy kroków, przykłady albo kod.
Higiena15 / 15
Bez zaślepek typu TODO, bez ścieżek Windows, z licencją.
Ryzykobrak sygnałów w skanie
Pliki w paczce
3
Skrypty
1
Komentarze HTML
2
Adresy URL w SKILL.md
0
Przestarzałość

Brak sygnałów. Repozytorium zmienione 28.09.2026, bez odwołań do wycofanych modeli i API.

Licencja

MIT, otwarta: można używać i zmieniać, z zachowaniem informacji o autorze.

Co sprawdzić przed instalacją
  • 1 skrypt w paczce. Przejrzyj je przed instalacją, bo Claude może je uruchomić.
  • SKILL.md zawiera komentarze HTML (2). Nie widać ich w podglądzie Markdown, a model je czyta.

Skrypty: bin/authorized-completion-test.rb

Co robi i kiedy

Wznawia przerwaną pracę z ustrukturyzowanym punktem kontrolnym: co zrobione, co dalej i jak sprawdzić ukończenie.

Wyzwalacze z opisu

continuekeep going

Argumenty

/continue [focus text or scope]
Oryginalny opis (EN)

Resume an in-progress task with a structured checkpoint instead of a bare "continue", re-establishing what is done, what is next, and how done is verified. Use when resuming work after an interruption, handoff, or a vague "keep going".

Jak działa

SKILL.md bez nagłówków drugiego poziomu · 101 linii, 999 słów

Podgląd SKILL.md
---
name: continue
description: Resume an in-progress task with a structured checkpoint instead of a bare "continue", re-establishing what is done, what is next, and how done is verified. Use when resuming work after an interruption, handoff, or a vague "keep going".
argument-hint: '[focus text or scope]'
---

# Continue

For crash or restart recovery, first read the installed
[pause recovery procedure](../pause/references/recovery.md). Combine available
checkpoints with newer relevant logs and live state; a missing handoff is not
a blocker. Verify uncertain external effects before replaying them. Preserve
intentional pauses, expired windows and budgets; recovery grants no new authority.

Resume the current task. Before doing any new work, re-establish context so work does not drift or
repeat:

1. **Repo rules** - Read `AGENTS.md` first so repo-specific commands, formatting, boundaries, and
   safety rules are current before acting.
2. **Where we are** - Summarize in 2-4 lines what is already done (cite files, commits, PRs, issues,
   or linked planning docs) and the current goal. If there is no task currently in progress (no prior
   conversation, no staged work, no recent commits on this branch, and no open PR or issue context),
   say so and ask the user what to continue instead of inferring a goal. If the goal is unclear but
   prior work exists, state your best inference and proceed only when confidence is reasonable; for
   low-confidence inference, state the hypothesis and ask the user to confirm before acting.
3. **What is next** - List the remaining steps to reach done, refresh their live dependencies, then
   pick the next coherent objective. Treat a saved next-step ordering as a stale hypothesis, not an
   instruction to block on its first item.
4. **Definition of done** - Restate the overall success criteria in one line, plus the command or
   test that will verify it. If there is no runnable check, state how completion will be confirmed.
5. Continue through the **authorized outcome**, completing the remaining coherent objectives.
   Advance independent in-scope work while a command, check, review, or agent is pending. Stop
   when the outcome is verified, a genuine blocker requires input, or the user requests a pause.
   Honor an explicit one-step or otherwise bounded request; completing that boundary is then done.

Re-run the applicability gate before consuming a persisted
`coordination_not_applicable` outcome whenever the resume crosses a controller
or session boundary, relies on durable handoff or crash recovery, or changes the
target set or topology. Each of those is itself a requiring condition, so the
persisted outcome is stale evidence there, not authority. A replacement actor or
a replacement chat resuming from a durable handoff does not re-verify: it is
`coordination_required`, per the restart prompts in
`docs/agent-runner-restarts.md`. Only a relaunch of the same controller over the
same exact target set, with no other actor able to mutate it, can re-verify as
`coordination_not_applicable`.

When the gate still resolves to `coordination_not_applicable`, consume that
outcome, skip every coordination and typed-event call, and never report
coordination as unavailable or degraded, even when the repository configures a
real backend. Recover the lane from durable local state instead.

For a resumed `coordination_required` PR-batch lane, complete bounded ownership
recovery before any
write. If a new actor takes over abandoned ownership, emit private-backend
`human_intervention` with `kind: takeover`; if a fenced replacement supersedes
the prior actor, use `kind: supersede`. A routine same-thread resume with the
same verified holder is neither a takeover nor a supersede and emits no event.
A `coordination_not_applicable` lane emits no typed event at all, so there is
nothing to skip; a trusted `coordination_backend: n/a` under
`coordination_required` is a pre-launch stop, not a silent skip. Typed-event transport is optional: when an active
private backend does not advertise it or reports it
unsupported, record `typed event transport: unavailable`, skip the emission,
and continue without marking the event emission `UNKNOWN`. Only after the
transport is advertised does an attempted write that fails, degrades, or is
rejected become `UNKNOWN` handoff evidence. Every attempted advertised
typed-event write must resolve the backend-advertised event executable and
ordered opaque argv; a missing, malformed, or unsafe advertisement is an
attempted-write failure. Run that exact executable and separate argv without
shell evaluation, with a finite deadline in its own process group, preserving
each opaque argument; on expiry terminate the whole group with `TERM`, then
`KILL` after a finite grace period. A deadline expiry, forced termination, or
any other advertised-support write failure records best-effort `UNKNOWN` event
evidence; the primary operation continues immediately without waiting further
on the event.

If the user supplied focus text or arguments, treat it as additional direction or a narrowed scope
for what to continue.

- Do not re-do completed work, and do not ask the user to repeat context you can reconstruct from
  the conversation, open files, or git state.
- Before another bounded poll or sleep, finish every runnable in-scope closeout task; wait only when no such work remains.
- When continuation is driven by a Goal monitor, require a material state-change
  delta or a typed terminal action with `wake_parent: true` before rebuilding
  task context for `deterministic-watcher` decisions. An unchanged deterministic
  probe is a persisted heartbeat, not a reason to continue. A `model-polling-only`
  fallback wake refreshes the minimal live blocker evidence, submits the next
  observation, and follows that decision; do not suppress the bounded fallback
  merely because its prior fingerprint was unchanged. After durably enqueuing
  each fallback continuation, acknowledge its `wake_id` before submitting the next observation;
  otherwise restart-safe redelivery intentionally fences newer evidence. On a changed fingerprint or typed terminal action,
  accept only the compact decision, refresh live dependencies, and rerun the
  task's security, origin, coordination, overlap, review, readiness, and
  exact-head gates before acting. A stale or duplicate probe remains suppressed;
  a terminal, non-resumable, user-input, or budget outcome stays stopped or
  paused with its restart-safe handoff.
- Honor `AGENTS.md` boundaries and safety rules while resuming; never push or take irreversible
  actions unless the task already authorized them.
- End with a `$status` report when that companion skill is installed; otherwise use the same four
  sections directly: Done, In progress, Blocked / needs input, and Next. Treat this closing summary
  as a report of the resumed work within the authorized outcome from step 5.

<!-- host-branch: cursor-only start -->
On Cursor, resume this same chat. Do not use `claude --resume`. Cursor `/loop`
is a model-polling fallback, not an out-of-context watcher.
<!-- host-branch: cursor-only end -->
Pliki w paczce (3)
  • SKILL.md 7 KB
  • agents/openai.yaml 1 KB
  • bin/authorized-completion-test.rb 2 KB

Wersje

RepozytoriumWynikLicencja
Ta strona · shakacode/agent-workflows86MIT
bdfinst/agentic-dev-team100MIT
ialameh/sift-coder100MIT
tonydzi/second-brain-starter-kit90MIT

Migawka bazy z 28.10.2026 · wersja paczki cd1483e943fc (skrót SHA-256 całej paczki)

Zgłoś problem z tym skillem: szkodliwa treść, błędny opis albo prośba autora o usunięcie.

Podobne skille

  • 100work-resume
    Wznawia wcześniejsze zadanie, dopasowując je rozmytym wyszukiwaniem we wszystkich repozytoriach po słowach z rozmowy.
  • 100portfolio-resume
    Wznawia pracę nad projektem cogni-portfolio i pokazuje status: co zrobione, co dalej i jakie są otwarte decyzje.
  • 100exomem-continue
    Wznawia kontekst poprzedniego projektu lub sesji z Exomem, gdy użytkownik chce kontynuować pracę albo przypomnieć sobie, co działo się wokół tematu.
  • 100load-context
    Wznawia sesję pracy z pliku CONTEXT-llm.md, gdy trzeba wrócić do zapisanego kontekstu i kontynuować poprzednią pracę.
  • 90handoff
    Tworzy i aktualizuje plik HANDOFF.md z krótkim stanem prac, z którego kolejna sesja może wznowić pracę.
  • 86handoff
    Pisze lub aktualizuje plik HANDOFF.md, aby nowy agent mógł kontynuować pracę bez utraty kontekstu.

Uwagi i zgłoszenia

Wiadomość trafi do Bartosza Sokolińskiego. Adres e-mail jest potrzebny tylko do odpowiedzi. Szczegóły w polityce prywatności.